ArticleCardiovascular and interventional radiology2025
Multicenter, PrOspective, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing GenIcular Artery EmbOlization Using Embosphere Microspheres to Corticosteroid iNjections for the Treatment of Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis: MOTION Study Protocol Summary.
Article in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05818150 (Multicenter, PrOspective, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing GenIcular Artery EmbOlization Using Embosphere Microspheres to Corticosteroid iNjections for the Treatment of Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Multicenter, PrOspective, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing GenIcular Artery EmbOlization Using Embosphere Microspheres to Corticosteroid iNjections for the Treatment of Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis: MOTION Study
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genicular Artery Embolization for Chronic Exudative Knee Synovitis: Prospective 6-Month Clinical and Functional Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Perspective: Genicular artery embolization for knee osteoarthritis - When the hype doesn't match the evidence.Osteoarthritis imaging · 2025Article
- Letter to Editor on Genicular Artery Embolization Versus Corticosteroid Injection in Knee Osteoarthritis: MOTION Study Protocol.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2025Article
- Genicular Artery Embolization: A Technical Review of Anatomy, Pathophysiology, Current Experiences, and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Genicular Artery Embolization: Embolic Material and Imaging Review.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCorticosteroid injections are commonly used to treat symptomatic knee osteoarthritis; however, pain relief is usually transient. Genicular artery embolization (GAE) has shown promise as an effective minimally invasive intervention to alleviate symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. The MOTION study is being conducted to compare outcomes following GAE versus corticosteroid injection. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis is an international, multicenter, randomized controlled investigational device exemption (IDE) study enrolling adults (≥ 21 years old) with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grades 1-4) across ≥ 45 centers worldwide. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive GAE with Embosphere® Microspheres (Merit Medical Systems, Inc.) or corticosteroid injections. The primary efficacy measure is clinical success at 6 months, defined as ≥ 50% improvement in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale. The primary safety measure is the proportion of patients free from treatment-related safety event(s) through 6-month post-index procedure (GAE or corticosteroid injection). Following the 6-month visit, patients in either cohort who do not achieve clinical success may crossover to the other study arm. Additional study measures will assess safety and efficacy outcomes throughout the 24-month follow-up period. The target sample size is 264 (132 per arm) and is based on the number of patients needed to confirm superior efficacy of GAE versus corticosteroid injections and non-inferiority with respect to safety. The overall study power is > 80%. DISCUSSION: Findings from the MOTION study are expected to provide information on the magnitude of the therapeutic benefits associated with GAE versus standard of care over 24 months.
trial registrationNCT05818150.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.