ArticleScientific reports2025
Prediction of the packaging chemical migration into food and water by cutting-edge machine learning techniques.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chemicals transfer from the packaging materials and their dissolution in food and water can create health risks. Due to the costly and time-intensive nature of experimental measurements, employing artificial intelligence (AI) methodologies is beneficial. This research uses five renowned AI-based techniques (namely, long short-term memory, gradient boosting regressor, multi-layer perceptron, Random Forest, and convolutional neural networks) to anticipate chemical migration from packaging materials to the food/water structure, considering variables such as temperature, chemical characteristics, and packaging/food types. The relevance analysis has been employed for monitoring the way that these explanatory variables impact the chemical migration from packaging materials into foods and water. Optimizing the hyperparameters, evaluating the prediction accuracy, and comparing the performance of these AI models reveal that the gradient boosting regressor (GBR) is the superior method for this simulation. The proposed GBR model accurately predicts 1847 experimental datasets, showcasing mean squared error, mean absolute error, root mean squared error, relative absolute error percent, and regressing coefficient, of 0.06, 0.15, 0.24, 6.46%, and 0.9961 respectively. Additionally, implementing a leverage algorithm for outlier detection further affirms the reliability of this modeling study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.