Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40050415›Full record

ArticleJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2025

Differences in serum concentrations of per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances by occupation among firefighters, other first responders, healthcare workers, and other essential workers in Arizona, 2020-2023.

Cedar L Mitchell, James Hollister, Julia M Fisher, Shawn C Beitel, Ferris Ramadan, Shawn O'Leary, Zhihua Tina Fan, Karen Lutrick, Jefferey L Burgess, Katherine D Ellingson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Integrated thermal and phytoremediation of agricultural soils impacted by PFAS.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Differential metabolic profiles by training fire exposure in female firefighters.International journal of hygiene and environmental health · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Cedar L MitchellEpidemic Intelligence Service, CDC, Atlanta, GA, USA. tqo8@cdc.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4811-2074
James HollisterMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Julia M FisherStatistics Consulting Laboratory, BIO5 Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Shawn C BeitelMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Ferris RamadanMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Shawn O'LearyEnvironmental and Chemical Laboratory Services (ECLS), Public Health & Environmental Laboratories (PHEL), New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH), Ewing, NJ, USA.
Zhihua Tina FanEnvironmental and Chemical Laboratory Services (ECLS), Public Health & Environmental Laboratories (PHEL), New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH), Ewing, NJ, USA.
Karen LutrickCollege of Medicine - Tucson, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Jefferey L BurgessMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Katherine D EllingsonMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.

Funding

Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Exposures and COVID-19 Vaccine EffectivenessR21ES033598 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI BURGESS, JEFFEREY L. · 2021 to 2022
$415k
Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) Exposures and COVID-19 in FirefightersR21ES032680 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI BURGESS, JEFFEREY L. · 2020 to 2021
$405k
Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NIEHS NIH HHS R21 ES032680NIEHS NIH HHS R21 ES033598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCertain occupations have greater risk for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) exposure because of PFAS use in occupation-associated materials.

objectiveWe sought to assess whether PFAS concentrations differed by occupation among certain Arizona workers and whether concentrations differed over time by occupation.

methodsSerum concentrations for 14 PFAS were measured among 1960 Arizona Healthcare, Emergency Responder, and Other Essential Worker Study participants. Samples were collected at enrollment and periodically during July 2020-April 2023. Occupational categories included firefighters, other first responders, healthcare workers, and other essential workers. We fit multilevel regression models for each PFAS to estimate differences in geometric mean concentrations or odds of PFAS detection at enrollment by occupational category. For participants with ≥1 serum sample, we evaluated for yearly longitudinal differences in PFAS concentrations by occupational category. We used other essential workers for comparison, and adjusted for age, sex, race and ethnicity, year, and residential county.

resultsAdjusting for covariates, firefighters had higher perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS), branched and linear perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), and perfluoroheptanesulfonic acid (PFHpS) concentrations than other essential workers (geometric mean ratios 95% CIs: 1.26 [1.11-1.43]; 1.18 [1.06-1.32]; 1.19 [1.08-1.31]; and 1.19 [1.01-1.39], respectively). Healthcare workers had higher odds of detection of branched perfluorooctanoic acid (Sb-PFOA) and perfluorododecanoic acid (PFDoA) than other essential workers, adjusting for covariates (odds ratios 95% CIs: 1.35 [1.01-1.80]; 2.50 [1.17-5.34], respectively). During the 3-year study, we detected declines in PFAS concentrations among other essential workers; few longitudinal differences in concentrations by occupation were detected. IMPACT STATEMENT: Using data from a large prospective cohort of frontline workers in Arizona, we compared serum concentrations of 14 per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) among firefighters, other first responders, healthcare workers, and other frontline essential workers. We found that firefighters have higher concentrations of certain PFAS chemicals and the odds of detecting other PFAS chemicals are higher among healthcare workers compared with people in other occupations. Our findings highlight the importance of further action to reduce PFAS exposure within highly exposed occupational groups, such as firefighters, and the need to expand evaluation of exposure among other occupations, including healthcare workers.

Indexed as

FirefightersFluorocarbonsHealth PersonnelOccupational ExposureOccupationsAdultArizonaFemaleFrontline WorkersHumansMaleMiddle AgedFluorocarbonsFirefightingHealthcare workersOccupational healthPer-and polyfluoroalkyl substances

Identifiers

PMID40050415
PMCPMC12068973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.