ArticleScientific reports2025
Drivers of spring migration phenology in Rocky Mountain elk.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
By migrating, ungulates take advantage of cyclical fluctuations in resources, which allows them to persist at greater population numbers than they would in the absence of these seasonal movements. We sought to identify the drivers of spring elk (Cervus canadensis) migration and evaluate how well individuals were able to optimize access to forage prior to departure, while migrating, and upon arrival on summer range. Specifically, we investigated the timing and duration of spring migration in four Colorado elk herds to test how forage quality and snow dynamics pre-, during, and post-migration influenced elk departure from winter range and the length of time spent migrating. Our analyses revealed significant heterogeneity among and within herds. Overall, spatiotemporal dynamics in forage and snow emerged as critical drivers influencing migratory phenology, but the discrete covariates associated with forage and snow were herd-specific. We did not find marked sub-strategies wherein some herds or individuals optimized a specific component of migration, but rather found that elk varied in their ability to optimize access to forage at all times analyzed. Our findings suggest that elk exhibit a flexible response to environmental cues, adjusting migration timing and duration in accordance with local conditions. These results contribute to a deeper understanding of the mechanisms driving ungulate migration and emphasize the importance of considering dynamic environmental factors in studies of migration phenology. Further, they emphasize the importance of forage conditions not just on the migratory route, but also on winter and summer range. Additionally, they provide baseline knowledge of elk migrations in Colorado, useful information for ensuring the conservation and persistence of these migratory routes and the productivity they facilitate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.