ArticleScientific reports2025
Auditory sequence learning with degraded input: children with cochlear implants ('nature effect') compared to children from low and high socio-economic backgrounds ('nurture effect').
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of Lateralization, Age, and Sex on Frequency Following Response in Children: Neural Speech Encoding to a 170 ms [da] Stimulus.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Implicit sequence learning (SL) is crucial for language acquisition and has been studied in children with organic language deficits (e.g., specific language impairment). However, language delays are also seen in children with non-organic deficits, such as those with hearing loss or from low socioeconomic status (SES). While some children with cochlear implants (CI) develop strong language skills, variability in performance suggests that degraded auditory input (nature) may affect SL. Low SES children typically experience language delays due to environmental deprivation (nurture). The purpose of this study was to investigate nature versus nurture effects on auditory SL. A total of 100 participants were divided into normal hearing (NH) children, young adults, CI children from high-moderate SES, and NH children from low SES who were tested with two Serial Reaction Time (SRT) tasks with speech and environmental sounds, and with cognitive tests. Results showed SL for speech and nonspeech stimuli for all participants, suggesting that SL is resilient to degradation of auditory and language input and that SL is not specific to speech. Absolute reaction time (RT) (reflecting a combination of complex processes including SL) was found to be a sensitive measure for differentiating between groups and between types of stimuli. Specifically, normal hearing groups showed longer RT for speech compared to environmental stimuli, a prolongation that was not evident for the CI group, suggesting similar perceptual strategies applying for both sound types; and RT of Low SES children was the longest for speech stimuli compared to other groups of children, evidence of the negative impact of language deprivation on speech processing. Age was the largest contributing factor to the results (~ 50%) followed by cognitive abilities (~ 10%). Implications for intervention include speech-processing targeted programs, provided early in the critical periods of development for low SES children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.