Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40050357›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Proposing a machine learning-based model for predicting nonreassuring fetal heart.

Nasibeh Roozbeh, Farideh Montazeri, Mohammadsadegh Vahidi Farashah, Vahid Mehrnoush, Fatemeh Darsareh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nasibeh RoozbehMother and Child Welfare Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
Farideh MontazeriMother and Child Welfare Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
Mohammadsadegh Vahidi FarashahMother and Child Welfare Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
Vahid MehrnoushMother and Child Welfare Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
Fatemeh DarsarehMother and Child Welfare Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran. famadarsareh@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The capacity to forecast nonreassuring fetal heart (NFH) is essential for minimizing perinatal complications; therefore, this research aims to establish if a machine learning (ML) model can predict NFH. This was a retrospective analysis of information gathered from singleton cases over the gestational age of 28 weeks that sought vaginal delivery between January 2020 and January 2022. The information was acquired from the "Iranian Maternal and Neonatal Network."A predictive model was built using four statistical ML models (decision tree classification, random forest classification, extreme gradient boost classification, and permutation feature classification with k-nearest neighbors). Because of the limited studies on the identification of NFH predictors, we decided to use the Chi-Square test to compare demographic, obstetric, maternal, and neonatal factors to identify NFH predictors. Then, all variables with p-values less than 0.05 were considered potential NFH predictors. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score were measured to evaluate their diagnostic performance. The incidence of NFH in our study population was 9.2%. Based on our findings NFH was more common in cases of intrauterine growth restriction, late-term, post-term, and preterm births, preeclampsia, placenta abruption, primiparous, induced labor, male fetus, and lower in birth with the presence of doula support. Random forest classification (AUROC: 0.77), decision tree classification and extreme gradient boost classification (AUROC: 0.76), and permutation feature classification with K-nearest neighbors (AUROC: 0.77), all showed good performance in predicting NFH. The higher performance belonged to random forest classification with an accuracy of 0.77 and precision of 0.72. Although this study found that the classification tree models performed well in predicting NFH, more research is needed to make a better conclusion on the performance of ML models in predicting NFH.

Indexed as

Fetal HeartMachine LearningAdultFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornMalePregnancyRetrospective StudiesROC CurveFetal heartMachine learningNonreassuring fetal heartNonreassuring fetal statusX gradient boost model

Identifiers

PMID40050357
PMCPMC11885418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.