ArticleScientific reports2025
Establishment and validation of a prognostic nomogram for overall survival in type II endometrial carcinoma patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of prognostic risk factors and construction of nomograms for elderly patients with stage III-IV endometrioid endometrial carcinoma: a study based on the SEER database.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Development and validation of prognostic nomograms for patients with cervical cancer and liver metastasis: a SEER-based study.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to develop and validate a nomogram model to predict overall survival (OS) in patients with type II endometrial carcinoma (EC). Data from patients with confirmed type II EC enrolled between 2010 and 2018 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients were randomly allocated to training and validation groups in a 7:3 ratio. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify independent prognostic risk factors, which were included in constructing the nomogram model. The concordance index (C-index), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to assess the prediction accuracy and clinical utility of the nomogram model. The effects of different variables on survival probability were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. A total of 3,933 eligible patients with type II EC were identified and included in this study. Independent risk factors for type II EC were found to be race, tumor size, histology, grade, T stage, N stage, M stage, examination of para-aortic lymph nodes, examination of pelvic lymph nodes, surgery, lung metastasis, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. A prognostic nomogram was constructed based on these variables. The C-index for the training cohort was 0.791 (95% CI 0.780-0.802) and for the validation cohort was 0.798 (95% CI 0.778-0.818). The ROC curve demonstrated good prediction accuracy. The calibration curve indicated strong agreement between predicted and actual values. The DCA showed that the nomogram model has significant clinical utility and potential. This study developed a survival prediction model for patients with type II EC to assist clinicians in evaluating prognostic factors, predicting OS, and determining appropriate treatment protocols to improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.