ArticleScientific reports2025
Effect of waste water bottle and treated sisal fibers on the durability and mechanical properties of concrete.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Use of fibres and surface treatment to improve the durability of concrete affected by sulphide mining.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Globally, the disposal of waste plastic bottles is challenging. However, many researchers reported the importance of incorporating waste polyethylene-based waste water bottles (WWB) as a fiber and treated sisal fiber separately in the concrete mixture. However, it is novel to reinforce concrete by WWB fiber and treated sisal fiber together for more production of sustainable concrete. So the present study investigated the effect of using different doses of WWB fiber with and without treated sisal fiber on the physical and mechanical properties of concrete. Also, it is detail discussed its effect on concrete durability like in different elevated temperatures and acidic environments. As the result indicates, the reinforcement of concrete by WWB and treated sisal fibers lessens the fresh density and in 5% of HCl solution, it give higher strength and lower mass loss compared to the control concrete. Also, concrete WF25 increased compressive strength by 34.6%, 7.42%, and 3.6% respectively at 28, 56, and 180 days of concrete age, while concrete sample WF100 highly increased the splitting tensile strength of concrete by 26.67% compared to the control concrete mixture. Concrete having only WWB without treated sisal fiber reduced water absorption, increased mass loss, and lessened strength at 200, 300, and 400 °C elevated temperatures. So, this study is significant for implementing improved construction material performance by WWB and treated sisal fibers, as well as supporting the reduction of plastic bottles from the environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.