ArticleScientific reports2025
Single cones give rise to multi-cone types in the retinas of fishes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exposure to Predators Induces Phenotypic Plasticity in Cone Opsin Expression Profiles but not in Eye Size of Female Trinidad Guppies.Zoological studies · 2026Article
- A standardized nomenclature for the rods and cones of the vertebrate retina.PLoS biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Retinal cone photoreceptors are specialized neurons that capture light to begin the process of daylight vision. They occur as individual cells (i.e., single cones), or as combinations of structurally linked cells, such as the double and triple cones found in the retinas of non-eutherian vertebrates. These different morphological cone types form mosaics of varying regularity, with single and double cones patterned as nearly perfect lattices in the retinas of many bony fishes (teleosts) and some geckos. Although double cones were first reported over 150 years ago, how they form (i.e., whether from coalescing single cones, or from structurally linked cone progenitors) remains uncertain. In turn, whether there is a general vertebrate sequence in appearance of morphological cone types and mosaics is unknown. Here, the developing retinas of seven species of teleosts were examined revealing that only single cones, arranged in hexagonal-like mosaics, were present at the earliest stages of photoreceptor differentiation. Double cones arose from coalescing single cones and the formation of multi-cone type mosaics (such as the square mosaic, where each single cone is surrounded by four double cones) followed different dynamics depending on whether the species was altricial or precocial. Single cones were therefore the primordial cells from which all multi-cone types arose and hexagonal-like mosaics preceded other mosaic patterns. Based on observations from transitional retinas, we propose a model for mosaic transformation from hexagonal to square. The double cones of fishes and those of land vertebrates constitute an example of convergent evolution to achieve the elliptical waveguide structure, likely for improved spatio-temporal resolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.