ArticleScientific reports2025
Classifying microfossil radiolarians on fractal pre-trained vision transformers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While deep learning techniques, especially image classification using deep learning, continue to evolve, it has been noted that there is a large time gap in applying these techniques in geological studies. Recently, a new architecture called the vision transformer (ViT), which is an alternative to convolutional neural networks (CNN), has attracted considerable attention. In addition, it has been proposed that the pre-training of classification models using mathematically generated images instead of real images, called formula-driven supervised learning (FDSL), achieves a comparative or even higher performance in visual understanding. In this study, we applied these new techniques to the classification of microfossils (radiolarians). Compared with a previous CNN model, the ViT-based model achieved 6-8% higher average precision. On average, the precision of the FDSL pre-trained models was slightly higher than that of the models pre-trained on real images. Therefore, we propose that these techniques may be suitable for image classification in geological tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.