ArticleScientific reports2025
GWO and WOA variable step MPPT algorithms-based PV system output power optimization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improved finite control set model predictive current control design for variable-speed wind-energy conversion system connected to the grid via an LCL filter.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- An improved grey wolf optimization-based MPPT algorithm for photovoltaic systems under partial shading conditions.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- High-efficiency predictive torque control of induction motors in PV water pumping using GTO-optimized PI controller.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- In-situ efficiency and parameter estimation for induction motors using heuristic optimization.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- MPPT algorithms for grid-connected solar systems including deep learning approaches.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Two-layer hierarchical MPPT strategy of PV systems based on AF-EPO algorithm under complex irradiance conditions.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2026Article
- Optimized PV fed sensorless BLDC motor control system using Q-recurrent adaptive controller and Levy-enhanced circular search mechanisms.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- An Enhanced Randomized Dung Beetle Optimizer for Global Optimization Problems.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Hybrid fuzzy logic approach for enhanced MPPT control in PV systems.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Control of three-level quadratic DC-DC boost converters for energy systems using various technique-based MPPT methods.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The nonlinear characteristics and low efficiency of photovoltaic (PV) systems remain critical challenges that necessitate advanced solutions. This study proposes two innovative Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) algorithms based on the Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA) and Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO). The primary advantage of these methods lies in their adaptive step-size optimization, leveraging multiple criteria to determine the optimal step size. A novel fitness function was developed to improve tracking accuracy, minimize ripple, and reduce overshoot. Simulation results demonstrated remarkable improvements, including up to 98% reduction in ripple, 67% reduction in overshoot, and significant improvements in tracking accuracy compared to fixed-step methods. Field validation was conducted using real-world data from the Ain El Melh PV station in Algeria on June 21, 2023. Experimental results confirmed the effectiveness of the proposed methods, with the WOA-based MPPT achieving up to 99% ripple reduction and 40% overshoot reduction under dynamic environmental conditions. A comparative analysis of MPPT algorithms revealed superior performance metrics for the bio-inspired methods. The PO-WOA algorithm achieved the highest efficiency of 98.87% in simulation and 98.94% in real data, surpassing both PO and PO-GWO. It also minimized power loss to 0.56 W in simulation and 0.39 W in real data, demonstrating its optimization capabilities under fluctuating conditions. Although its response time was slightly longer than other methods, at 0.65 s in simulation and 0.48 s in real data, it prioritized stability and precision. These findings underscore the potential of WOA and GWO algorithms to enhance PV system performance, offering robust and efficient solutions for optimizing energy output in both simulation and real-world scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.