Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40050315›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

GWO and WOA variable step MPPT algorithms-based PV system output power optimization.

Abderrahim Zemmit, Abdelouadoud Loukriz, Khaled Belhouchet, Yahya Z Alharthi, Muhannad Alshareef, Prabhu Paramasivam, Sherif S M Ghoneim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abderrahim ZemmitElectrical Engineering Department, Electrical Engineering Laboratory (LGE), University of M'Sila, M'Sila, 28000, Algeria. abderrahim.zemmit@univ-msila.dz.
Abdelouadoud LoukrizElectrical Engineering Department, University of Science and Technology Houari Boumediene, Alger, 1611, Algeria.
Khaled BelhouchetElectrical Engineering Department, Electrical Engineering Laboratory (LGE), University of M'Sila, M'Sila, 28000, Algeria.
Yahya Z AlharthiDepartment of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Hafr Albatin, Hafr Al Batin, 39524, Saudi Arabia.
Muhannad AlshareefDepartment of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering and Computing in Al-Qunfudhah, Umm al-Qura University, Mecca, Saudi Arabia.
Prabhu ParamasivamDepartment of Research and Innovation, Saveetha School of Engineering, SIMATS, Chennai, 602105, India. prabhu.paramasivam@meu.edu.et.
Sherif S M GhoneimDepartment of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, Taif University, Taif, 21944, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nonlinear characteristics and low efficiency of photovoltaic (PV) systems remain critical challenges that necessitate advanced solutions. This study proposes two innovative Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) algorithms based on the Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA) and Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO). The primary advantage of these methods lies in their adaptive step-size optimization, leveraging multiple criteria to determine the optimal step size. A novel fitness function was developed to improve tracking accuracy, minimize ripple, and reduce overshoot. Simulation results demonstrated remarkable improvements, including up to 98% reduction in ripple, 67% reduction in overshoot, and significant improvements in tracking accuracy compared to fixed-step methods. Field validation was conducted using real-world data from the Ain El Melh PV station in Algeria on June 21, 2023. Experimental results confirmed the effectiveness of the proposed methods, with the WOA-based MPPT achieving up to 99% ripple reduction and 40% overshoot reduction under dynamic environmental conditions. A comparative analysis of MPPT algorithms revealed superior performance metrics for the bio-inspired methods. The PO-WOA algorithm achieved the highest efficiency of 98.87% in simulation and 98.94% in real data, surpassing both PO and PO-GWO. It also minimized power loss to 0.56 W in simulation and 0.39 W in real data, demonstrating its optimization capabilities under fluctuating conditions. Although its response time was slightly longer than other methods, at 0.65 s in simulation and 0.48 s in real data, it prioritized stability and precision. These findings underscore the potential of WOA and GWO algorithms to enhance PV system performance, offering robust and efficient solutions for optimizing energy output in both simulation and real-world scenarios.

Indexed as

GWOMPPTOptimizationVariable step size MPPT algorithmWOA

Identifiers

PMID40050315
PMCPMC11885651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.