ArticleScientific reports2025
A study of dynamic functional connectivity changes in flight trainees based on a triple network model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spectral dynamic causal modeling of effective connectivity across multiple brain networks in pilot trainees.iScience · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based identification and brain network characterization of flight cadets compared with air traffic control (ATC) students using static and dynamic functional connectivity.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Neuroadaptive changes in brain structural-functional coupling among pilots.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The time-varying functional connectivity of the Central Executive Network (CEN), Default Mode Network (DMN), and Salience Network (SN) in flight trainees during a resting state was investigated using dynamic functional network connectivity (dFNC). The study included 39 flight trainees and 37 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Resting-state fMRI data and behavioral test outcomes were obtained from both groups. Independent component analysis (ICA), sliding window, and K-means clustering approaches were utilized for evaluating functional network connectivity (FNC) and temporal metrics based on the triple networks. Correlation analyses were performed on the behavioral assessments and these metrics. The flight trainees demonstrated a significantly enhanced functional connection linking the CEN and DMN in state 2 (P < 0.05, FDR corrected). Additionally, flight trainees spent less time in state 5, while they exhibited a protracted mean dwell time and fractional windows in state 2, which were significantly correlated with accuracy on the Berg Card Sorting Test (BCST) and Change Detection Test (all P < 0.05). The improved connectivity of flight trainees between the CEN and DMN following the completion of rigorous flight training resulted in increased stability. This enhancement may be relevant to cognitive abilities such as decision-making, memory, and information integration. When multitasking, flight trainees displayed superior visual processing skills and enhanced cognitive flexibility. dFNC research provides a unique perspective on the sophisticated cognitive capabilities that are required in high-demand, high-stress occupations such as piloting, thereby providing significant insights into the intricate brain mechanisms that are inherent in these domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.