ArticleScientific reports2025
Prognostic model for log odds of negative lymph node in locally advanced rectal cancer via interpretable machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prognostic value of the log odds of negative lymph nodes/T stage ratio (LONT) in postoperative esophageal cancer: a SEER-based study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
No studies have examined the prognostic value of the log odds of negative lymph nodes/T stage (LONT) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). We aimed to assess the prognostic value of LONT and develop a machine learning model to predict overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in LARC patients treated with nCRT. The study included 820 LARC patients who received nCRT between September 2010 and October 2017. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses identified prognostic factors, which were then used to develop risk assessment models with 9 machine learning algorithms. Model hyperparameters were optimized using random search and 10-fold cross-validation. The models were evaluated using metrics such as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC), decision curve analysis, calibration curves, and precision and accuracy for predicting OS and DFS. Shapley's additive explanations (SHAP) was also used for model interpretation. The study included 820 patients, identifying LONT as a significant independent prognostic factor for both OS and DFS. Nine machine learning algorithms were used to create predictive models based on these factors. The extreme gradient boosting (XGB) model showed the best performance, with a mean AUC of 0.89 for OS and 0.83 for DFS in 10-fold cross-validation. Additionally, the predictions generated by the XGB model were analyzed using SHAP. Finally, we developed an online web-based calculator utilizing the XGB model to enhance the model's generalizability and to provide improved support for physicians in their decision-making processes. The study developed an XGB model utilizing LONT to predict OS and DFS in patients with LARC undergoing nCRT. Furthermore, an online web calculator was constructed using the XGB model to facilitate the model's generalization and to enhance physician decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.