ArticleGenome research2025
Integrating short-read and long-read single-cell RNA sequencing for comprehensive transcriptome profiling in mouse retina.
Article in Genome research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Long read sequencing of retinal RNA improves killifish transcriptome annotation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- NanoPrePro: a fully equipped, fast, and memory-efficient preprocessor for nanopore transcriptomic sequencing.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Systematic evaluation of long- and short-read RNA-seq for human peripheral blood.NAR molecular medicine · 2026Article
- Dynamic changes in mRNA isoform usage during human retinal development.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Current status of transcriptome sequencing technology in ruminants.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Review
- A proteogenomic atlas of the human neural retina.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The vast majority of protein-coding genes in the human genome produce multiple mRNA isoforms through alternative splicing, significantly enhancing the complexity of the transcriptome and proteome. To establish an efficient method for characterizing transcript isoforms within tissue samples, we conducted a systematic comparison between single-cell long-read and conventional short-read RNA sequencing techniques. The transcriptome of approximately 30,000 mouse retina cells was profiled using 1.54 billion Illumina short reads and 1.40 billion Oxford Nanopore Technologies long reads. Consequently, we identify 44,325 transcript isoforms, with a notable 38% previously uncharacterized and 17% expressed exclusively in distinct cellular subclasses. We observe that long-read sequencing not only matches the gene expression and cell-type annotation performance of short-read sequencing but also excel in the precise identification of transcript isoforms. While transcript isoforms are often shared across various cell types, their relative abundance shows considerable cell type-specific variation. The data generated from our study significantly enhance the existing repertoire of transcript isoforms, thereby establishing a resource for future research into the mechanisms and implications of alternative splicing within retinal biology and its links to related diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.