Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40050123›Full record

ArticleBMJ mental health2025

Gender identity and mental health inequalities 2001-2022: population-level evidence from an Australian cohort study.

Karinna Saxby, Sara Hutchinson Tovar, Glenda M Bishop, Ian Down, Ricki Spencer, Dennis Petrie, Zoe Aitken

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Karinna SaxbyMelbourne Institute: Applied Economic and Social Research, Faculty of Business and Economics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia karinna.saxby@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-0100-8437
Sara Hutchinson TovarMonash Business School, Centre For Health Economics, Monash University, Caulfield, Victoria, Australia.
Glenda M BishopCentre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Ian DownLGBTIQ+ Health Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Ricki SpencerPublic consumer, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Dennis PetrieMonash Business School, Centre For Health Economics, Monash University, Caulfield, Victoria, Australia.
Zoe AitkenCentre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5413-2450

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTrans, non-binary and gender-diverse (TGD) people experience poorer mental health relative to cisgender populations. However, we know little on how TGD mental health inequalities are changing over time. With newly available information on gender identity within Australia's largest longitudinal household survey, we aimed to provide the first nationally representative estimates of temporal trends in TGD mental health inequalities.

methodsWe used the 2001-2022 Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey, a national probability sample of Australian adults. Using questions about sex at birth and gender identity, asked in the 2022 wave, we compared temporal trends in mental health among TGD and cisgender respondents. Mental health was measured using the five-item Mental Health Inventory (MHI). Adjusting for age, income and other observable characteristics, we calculated annual population-weighted estimates of mean MHI Scores for TGD and cisgender respondents and corresponding TGD mental health inequalities.

resultsAcross the 22-year period, TGD respondents consistently reported poorer mental health than cisgender respondents. Prior to 2010, differences in MHI Scores were more variable, but TGD MHI Scores were generally lower than cisgender respondents. From 2010 onwards, there was a trend of widening inequalities, with TGD-cisgender MHI inequalities ranging from -5.1 (95% CI -10.6, 0.3) in 2010 to -7.6 (95% CI -10.8, -4.4) in 2022, indicating clinically relevant differences in mental health. Effects were driven by younger populations.

conclusionTGD-cisgender mental health inequalities are increasing in Australia, with inequalities more apparent between 2010 and 2022. Policy action and greater protections for gender-diverse Australians are urgently needed.

Indexed as

Gender IdentityHealth Status DisparitiesMental HealthTransgender PersonsAdolescentAdultAgedAustraliaCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultAdult psychiatryChild & adolescent psychiatryData Interpretation, StatisticalDepression

Identifiers

PMID40050123
PMCPMC12010290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.