ArticleBMJ open2025
Addressing the challenges and constraints of social protection policies for Peruvian women domestic workers: the ANITA project study protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Working conditions and labour rights coverage of women domestic workers in Peru: a respondent-driven sampling study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Characterising access to healthcare and the health status of women domestic workers in Peru: a respondent-driven sampling study.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Assessing health disparities faced by female paid domestic workers in Peru before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDomestic workers (DWs) are vulnerable to precarious or informal working conditions with limited access to social protection policies such as employer-paid health insurance or retirement pensions. This study aims to examine the working conditions, health status and access to healthcare for women DWs in Peru and propose recommendations to improve their access to social protection policies. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The project uses a participatory action research approach by engaging three committees: a DW co-researcher committee, an advisory committee and a steering committee. The first two include former or current DWs, while the third includes policymakers and academics. We use a sequential mixed-methods design organised in four phases: (1) secondary data analysis (n=4216): using two Peruvian national surveys to characterise working conditions, health status and access to healthcare; (2) face-to-face survey (n=448): with DWs in three cities, using respondent-driven sampling to further characterise working and health conditions and to identify factors that influence knowledge of and access to social protection policies; (3) qualitative interviews (n=30-46): with DWs, leaders of DW organisations, employers and policymakers to gather different perspectives on the facilitators and barriers to access to social protection policies; and (4) deliberative dialogues (n=14-26): with DW, leaders of DW organisations, employers, policymakers and academics to identify key barriers to the implementation of social protection policies and to develop recommendations for overcoming these barriers. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Phase 1 and Phase 2 received ethical clearance from Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia in Peru and Unity Health Toronto in Canada. Phase 3 and Phase 4 received ethical clearance from PRISMA Charitable Association in Peru and Unity Health Toronto in Canada. To mobilise knowledge, in collaboration with the committees, we will co-generate policy briefs and audiovisual materials to disseminate the results from this project to different audiences and sectors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.