ArticleBMJ open2025
Evaluating the impact of a full-service mobile food market on food security, diet quality and food purchases: a cluster randomised trial protocol and design paper.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05672186 (Evaluating Diet, Food Insecurity, and Food Purchasing Outcomes of a Full-Service Mobile Food Market With a Cluster Randomized Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluating Diet, Food Insecurity, and Food Purchasing Outcomes of a Full-Service Mobile Food Market With a Cluster Randomized Trial
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the Role of Social Supermarkets in Addressing Food Insecurity and Food Waste: A Scoping Review.Nutrition bulletin · 2026Article
- Food Access Matters: Quantifying the Price Differential Across Four Major Food Retailers and a Mobile Market Aiming to Improve Affordable Nutritious Food Access.Journal of nutrition education and behavior · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionMobile food markets may help to mitigate diet-related and weight-related inequities by bringing low-cost, nutritious food directly to underserved populations. By stocking foods to meet a range of dietary needs, full-service mobile markets may improve multiple aspects of diet, food security and fruit and vegetable procurement with a convenient one-stop shop. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This cluster randomised trial is evaluating the impact of a full-service mobile market, the Twin Cities Mobile Market (TCMM). The TCMM sells staple foods at affordable prices from a retrofitted bus that regularly visits communities experiencing low incomes. The trial's primary outcome is participant diet quality. Secondary outcomes include intake of specific foods and nutrients, food security and servings of fruits and vegetables procured for the home.Together with our partners, we enrolled four subsidised community housing sites in three waves (12 total sites), aimed to recruit 22 participants per site (N=264) and collected baseline data. Sites were then randomised to either receive the full-service TCMM intervention or serve as a waitlist control, and the full-service TCMM began implementing at intervention sites. Follow-up data collection is occurring at 6 months post-implementation. After follow-up data collection for each wave, the full-service TCMM intervention is being implemented at the waitlist control sites. Waves 1 and 2 are complete and Wave 3 is in progress.At baseline and follow-up data collection, dietary quality and intake are being assessed through three, interviewer-administered, 24-hour dietary recalls, food insecurity is being assessed by the 18-item Food Security Screening Module and fruit and vegetable procurement is being measured by collecting one month of food procurement tracking forms.We will use intent-to-treat analyses to determine if participant diet quality, food security and procurement of fruits and vegetables improve in the sites that received the full-service TCMM intervention relative to the participants in the waitlist control condition. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Trial procedures have been approved by the University of Minnesota Institutional Review Board. We plan to disseminate main outcomes in Grant Year 5 in both scientific and community spaces. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05672186.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.