Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40050055›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Beyond BRCA: A scoping review of person-centred care for women diagnosed with a BRCA gene mutation.

Leonie Emilia Witte, Cornelia van Diepen, Jane Murray Cramm

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leonie Emilia WitteErasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands witte@eshpm.eur.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-7967-0201
Cornelia van DiepenErasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6991-9443
Jane Murray CrammErasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5367-3207

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWomen diagnosed with BRCA1/2 mutations face significantly elevated lifetime risks of breast and ovarian cancer. Due to the distinctive biopsychosocial implications of a BRCA diagnosis, the care trajectory for these women is highly personalised, yet their care needs frequently remain unmet. The aim was to provide a first overview of the evidence of women's experiences with person-centred care (PCC) within BRCA care and their needs for further PCC implementation.

designA scoping review, guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews, was conducted. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL Plus and Google Scholar were searched for literature published between January 2004 and February 2024. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Peer-reviewed, primary studies on BRCA and PCC using quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods designs were eligible. The criteria were iteratively refined to include publications based on samples that were >80% female and >80% BRCA positive. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Titles and abstracts were screened with ASReview, a validated AI-driven tool. Data on PCC evidence and needs were extracted based on the eight Picker Principles of PCC and synthesised by describing themes within each principle.

resultsOf the 3801 articles identified as potentially relevant, 18 were included in the review. PCC needs were more prevalent than evidence of their implementation. Most of women's positive experiences with PCC focused on 'clear information, communication and support for self-care', while limited to no evidence existed for other principles. The highest needs were found for increased 'emotional support, empathy and respect', 'attention to physical and environmental needs', and 'clear information, communication and support for self-care'. All articles reported demands for more holistic, yet personalised care, though PCC was not mentioned explicitly.

conclusionsThis review suggests a person-centred approach is relevant to improving the standard of BRCA care for women. The first evidence of women's experiences with PCC demonstrates how care delivered with sensitivity and respect for individual backgrounds can support women throughout their BRCA trajectory. Yet, substantial unmet needs remain among female BRCA carriers, highlighting the importance of further research and PCC implementation to enhance the quality of postdiagnostic care.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsGenes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2Ovarian NeoplasmsPatient-Centered CareBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinFemaleHumansMutationBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanBreast tumoursCancer geneticsPatient-Centered CarePatient SatisfactionPerson-Centered CareQuality Improvement

Identifiers

PMID40050055
PMCPMC11887293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.