Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40050053›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Multicentre, multi-arm, double-blind randomised placebo-controlled dose-finding trial investigating the safety and Efficacy of MirococePt (APT070) In Reducing delayed graft function In the Kidney ALlograft (EMPIRIKAL-2): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Theodoros Kassimatis, Alima Rahman, Fayyad Jaradat, Abdel Douiri, Marc Delord, Roseanna Greenlaw, Joanne Palmer Joyce, Jonathon Olsburgh, Muhammad Khurram, Abbas Ghazanfar and 6 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Complement activation in kidney transplantation.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Theodoros KassimatisPeter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK theodoros.kasimatis@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6291-1278
Alima RahmanClinical Trial Management Service, Research and Development, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Fayyad JaradatTransplant, Renal and Urology Directorate, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Abdel DouiriSchool of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Marc DelordSchool of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Roseanna GreenlawPeter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Joanne Palmer JoyceClinical Trial Management Service, Research and Development, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Jonathon OlsburghTransplant, Renal and Urology Directorate, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Muhammad KhurramDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation, The Royal London Hospital, London, UK.
Abbas GhazanfarRenal and Transplant Unit, St George's Hospital, London, UK.
Simon KnightNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4837-9446
Peter FriendNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sapna ShahKing's Kidney Care, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Hannah KillbrideKent Kidney Care Centre, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Canterbury, Kent, UK.
Richard SmithSchool of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Steven SacksPeter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUp to 50% of kidney transplant patients are diagnosed with delayed graft function (DGF) following transplantation-the majority being linked to ischaemia reperfusion injury (IRI). DGF is traditionally defined as the requirement for dialysis during the first week after transplantation and is associated with inferior graft and patient outcomes. Local synthesis of complement components, largely by the renal tubule, plays a critical role in IRI. We have developed Mirococept, a membrane-targeted complement inhibitor, that can be administered to the donor kidney ex vivo prior to transplantation. After administration, Mirococept is retained in the donor organ, thereby minimising the risk of systemic side effects. We previously launched the EMPIRIKAL study aiming to evaluate the efficacy of Mirococept in reducing DGF in deceased-donor kidney transplantation (KT). The funding body recommended termination of the study to allow a dose-saturating study before the next stage of clinical evaluation. This was carried out in a porcine kidney model and led to a revised dosing regimen for EMPIRIKAL-2 (60-180 mg compared with 5-25 mg in the initial trial). The EMPIRIKAL-2 trial (REC 24/NE/0071) aims to identify the most safe and efficacious dose of Mirococept to reduce DGF rate in deceased-donor KT. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: EMPIRIKAL-2 is a Phase IIa multicentre double-blind randomised controlled trial (RCT) with an initial safety run. Participants will be recruited from renal departments at National Health Service tertiary hospital sites in the UK. The purpose of the safety run is to assess the tolerance of each of the three proposed Mirococept doses (60, 120 or 180 mg), before the RCT begins. Three patients will be assigned to each treatment dose, starting from the lower dose. The safety run will be considered successful if at least one dose can be taken forward to the RCT for comparison to placebo.If safety is met, 144 participants (36 per arm excluding drop-outs) will be randomised to all doses meeting the safety criteria or placebo on a 1:1:1:1 basis. The primary endpoint is DGF, defined as the requirement for dialysis during the first week after transplantation. Safety evaluation will include the monitoring of laboratory data and the recording of all adverse events. Immunosuppression therapy, antibiotic and antiviral prophylaxis will be administered as per local centre protocols. Enrolment in the RCT is anticipated to take approximately 12 months, and patients will be followed-up for 12 months. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the Northeast - Newcastle and North Tyneside 2 Research Ethics Service Committee, REC reference 24/NE/0071. The results of the study will be reported and disseminated at international conferences and in peer-reviewed scientific journals. Once published, a lay summary of the results will be made available to participants who request this information. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN14279222. Registered on 4 July 2024. PROTOCOL VERSION: 2.0 dated 9 May 2024.

Indexed as

Complement Inactivating AgentsDelayed Graft FunctionKidney TransplantationAllograftsAnimalsClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReperfusion InjurySwineComplement Inactivating AgentsNEPHROLOGYRandomised Controlled TrialRenal transplantation

Identifiers

PMID40050053
PMCPMC11887295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.