ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2025
Influence of time of birth in early neonatal mortality and morbidity: retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA key target of the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals is to eliminate preventable deaths in newborns and children under 5. This study aimed to estimate the effect of time of birth on early neonatal mortality (ENM) and low Apgar scores at 5 min (LA5) in newborns.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted using vital statistics data on live births, maternal morbidity, congenital defects and perinatal mortality in Cauca-Colombia (2017-2021) excluding out-of-hospital, multiple and major defect cases. A directed acyclic graph was constructed to define the confounder adjustment set. Multivariable logistic, linear and propensity score models evaluated the effect of birth timing on neonatal outcomes, estimating crude and adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRa).
resultsWe assessed 65 182 live births, finding similar baseline characteristics for daytime and night-time births. ENM was 0.2% (95% CI 0.19% to 0.26%) at 7 days of follow-up, absolute mortality difference 0.1% (95% CI -0.01% to 0.12%). Night-time births increased the incidence of ENM in the primary analysis IRRa 1.27 (95% CI 0.90 to 1.82), in the secondary IRRa 1.45 (95% CI 0.94 to 2.20), and in the primary and secondary sensitivity analysis, respectively, IRRa 1.48 (95% CI 1.06 to 2.07) and 1.70 (95% CI 1.16 to 2.59). LA5 was present in 0.7% (95% CI 0.60% to 0.72%) of birth, with absolute LA5 difference 0.1% (95% CI -0.02% to 0.22%). Night-time births increased the incidence of LA5 in the primary analysis IRRa 1.31 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.49), in the secondary IRRa 1.44 (95% CI 1.13 to 1.83), and in the primary and secondary sensitivity analysis, respectively, IRRa 1.31 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.59) and IRRa 1.54 (95% CI 1.23 to 1.92).
conclusionsBirth at night-time is associated with worse neonatal outcomes, ENM and low Apgar scores in Colombia's diverse population, highlighting the need for optimised prenatal care, revised work schedules and improved referral systems in maternal health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.