ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2025
Single-centre comparative study of in vitro fertilisation and naturally conceived babies in Indonesia.
Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn vitro fertilisation (IVF) offers a solution for infertility but poses increased obstetrical and perinatal risks, including higher rates of preterm birth, low birth weight and congenital anomalies. Particularly, IVF-related multiple pregnancies face significantly higher risks for preterm birth and prolonged hospital stays. This study compares neonatal outcomes between IVF and natural conception, as well as between singleton and IVF-related multiple pregnancies over the past decade.
methodThis retrospective study reviewed the medical records of babies born at Cipto Mangunkusumo Kencana Hospital from 2013 to 2023. Neonatal morbidities (hypothermia, hypoglycaemia, respiratory distress, circulation problems, sepsis, congenital anomalies, all stages of intraventricular haemorrhage and retinopathy of prematurity of all babies, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission and length of stay) were dependent variables, with the mode of conception as the independent variable.
resultOf 609 subjects, 169 were IVF conceptions and 435 natural conceptions. The IVF group had higher rates of prematurity (27.8% vs 10.8%, p<0.001), multiple conceptions (37.9% vs 7.4%, p<0.001) and older maternal age (35 vs 30 years, p<0.001). Prematurity in the IVF group had an increased rate of respiratory distress (18.9% vs 12.6%, p=0.05), higher NICU admission rates (13.6% vs 3.2%, p<0.001) and longer hospital stays.
conclusionIVF pregnancies had higher risks of prematurity and respiratory distress, necessitating personalised antenatal care and close monitoring to optimise neonatal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.