Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40050025›Full record

Observational studyBMJ paediatrics open2025

Analysis of early risk factors of death in preterm infants treated with iNO: a national multicentre retrospective study.

Liang Gao, Lian Wang, Yao Zhu, Guo-Bao Liang, Zhi Zheng, Xin-Zhu Lin, Sheng-Qian Huang, Ling Liu, Bao-Ying Feng, Qiu-Fen Wei and 11 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ paediatrics open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Liang Gao *Department of Neonatology, Women and Children's Hospital, Xiamen University School of Medicine, Xiamen, Fujian, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0157-7197
Lian Wang *Department of Neonatology, Women and Children's Hospital, Xiamen University School of Medicine, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Yao ZhuDepartment of Neonatology, Women and Children's Hospital, Xiamen University School of Medicine, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Guo-Bao LiangDepartment of Neonatology, Women and Children's Hospital, Xiamen University School of Medicine, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Zhi ZhengDepartment of Neonatology, Women and Children's Hospital, Xiamen University School of Medicine, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Xin-Zhu LinDepartment of Neonatology, Women and Children's Hospital, Xiamen University School of Medicine, Xiamen, Fujian, China xinzhufj@163.com.
Sheng-Qian Huang *Department of Neonatology, Guiyang Children's Hospital, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.
Ling LiuDepartment of Neonatology, Guiyang Children's Hospital, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.
Bao-Ying Feng *Department of Neonatology, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Qiu-Fen WeiDepartment of Neonatology, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Mu-Lin Yao *Department of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Hebei province, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Ma LiDepartment of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Hebei province, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Xu-Fang Fan *Department of Neonatology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Wen-Li DuanDepartment of Neonatology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Fa-Lin XuDepartment of Neonatology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Lu Zhu *Department of Neonatology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Fan WuDepartment of Neonatology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jing Zhang *Department of Neonatology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Jian MaoDepartment of Neonatology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Meng-Jiao Wang *Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital, Xian, China.
Zhan-Kui LiNorthwest Women's and Children's Hospital, Xian, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo analyse early risk factors for mortality in preterm infants treated with inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) in China.

designA retrospective observational case-control study.

setting8 tertiary hospitals in 5 regions of China. PATIENTS: 726 preterm infants treated with iNO for hypoxic respiratory failure or persistent pulmonary hypertension of newborns.

interventionsNone. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was survival status at discharge. MAIN

results(1) The mortality rate was 27.1% (197/726), and which significantly reduced with increasing gestational age (GA) and birth weight. (2) Compared with the survival group, the death group had significantly greater use of assisted reproductive technology, higher multiple pregnancy rates and lower caesarean section rates. Infants in the death group had a significantly higher incidence of small for GA (SGA), Apgar score ≤3 at 1 min after birth, pneumorrhagia, sepsis and shock. In the death group, the utilisation rate of a pulmonary surfactant (PS) was significantly lower, whereas the oxygenation index (OI) before iNO treatment was significantly higher. The maximum dose of iNO in the death group was significantly higher than that in the survival group. (3) The Cox proportional hazard model showed that SGA (HR 1.800, 95% CI (1.113 to 2.911)), sepsis (HR 1.488, 95% CI (1.093 to 2.027)), shock (HR 1.473, 95% CI (1.033 to 2.100)), OI before iNO treatment (HR 1.016, 95% CI (1.006 to 1.026)) and the maximum dose of iNO treatment (HR 1.070, 95% CI (1.035 to 1.105)) were risk factors for death in preterm infants treated with iNO. Furthermore, GA (HR 0.876, 95% CI (0.831 to 0.924)), PS (HR 0.433, 95% CI (0.296 to 0.633)) and a higher initial dose of iNO (HR 0.926, 95% CI (0.891 to 0.962)) were identified as protective factors. (4) Stratified analysis and sensitivity analysis determined the stability of the core results in preterm infants with GA between 28 and 36

conclusionPremature infants treated with iNO had a high mortality rate. SGA, sepsis, shock and higher OI before iNO treatment increased the mortality risk in infants with GA between 28 and 36 TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (http://www.chictr.org.cn; registration number: ChiCTR2200066935).

Indexed as

Nitric OxideRespiratory Distress Syndrome, NewbornRespiratory InsufficiencyAdministration, InhalationCase-Control StudiesChinaFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMaleRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsNitric OxideMortalityNeonatology

Identifiers

PMID40050025
PMCPMC11887303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.