ArticleJournal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry2025
Association of body mass index and clinical response in patients receiving ofatumumab for treatment of multiple sclerosis.
Article in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital signatures of fatigue and wearing-off symptoms in patients with multiple sclerosis under natalizumab.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026Article
- Discontinuation of ocrelizumab in multiple sclerosis: reoccurrence of disease activity.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2026Observational
- Disease outcomes following lateral switch among different CD20-antibodies in active multiple sclerosis.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2025Article
- Modeling lymphocyte subset dynamics after ublituximab therapy in patients with multiple sclerosis: an Italian prospective study.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- T lymphopenia in multiple sclerosis patients treated with ofatumumab: Even with consideration for CD3Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinicalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe impact of body weight on disability progression rates among patients receiving ofatumumab was not evaluated yet.
methodsAmong patients from a multicentre prospective cohort, baseline demographics were compared among body mass index (BMI) quartiles as well as proportions of clinical relapses, MRI lesions and disability worsening during follow-up.
results536 patients from four centres were included. Baseline demographics were evenly distributed among patients. Proportions of relapses and new/enlarging MRI lesions were comparable among BMI strata.Confirmed disability worsening was significantly more abundant among patients from the 4th BMI quartile (BMI ≥29.2 kg/m
conclusionsInflammatory disease outcomes did not differ but disability progression was more frequent in the highest BMI quartile (BMI >29.2 kg/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.