Observational studyEmergency medicine journal : EMJ2025
Reducing time delays and enhancing reperfusion eligibility related to stroke suspicion by the Emergency Medical Dispatch Centre: a registry-based observational study.
Observational study in Emergency medicine journal : EMJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsResearch on the importance of the Emergency Medical Dispatch Centre (EMDC) role in reducing the time delays for patients with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) is limited. This study aimed to analyse how Norwegian EMDCs' accurate suspicions can impact the clinical care times in this patient group.
methodsWe collected clinical care time metrics and acute reperfusion treatment data from the Norwegian Stroke Registry on patients with AIS in Western Norway who were evaluated by the EMDC and had an ambulance dispatched in 2021. In case a stroke was suspected by the EMDC, the dispatcher communicated their diagnosis suspicions to the ambulance personnel. Outcomes of interest were reperfusion treatment for AIS, prehospital and in-hospital time-to-treatment delays, and patient outcomes.
resultsOf the 1106 patients with AIS in our region, 771 (70 %) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The EMDC suspected a stroke in 481 cases (62 %). Patients with suspected stroke experienced lower ambulance on-scene times (11 min vs 15 min; p=0.001), Emergency Medical Service prehospital times (40 min vs 49 min; p=0.021) and door-to-needle times (23 min vs 31 min; p=0.023). The EMDC stroke suspicion was associated with increased thrombolysis rates (OR 2.42 (95% CI 1.72 to 3.40)) after adjusting for age, sex, risk factors and functional status prior to the stroke event. The door-to-groin puncture times were lower for patients with a stroke suspicion who received endovascular treatment (65 min vs 85 min; p=0.004). No differences in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at the initial hospital arrival (4 vs 4; p=0.42) or in 90-day functional independence outcomes (rate of modified Rankin Scale score 0-2; 240 (61%) vs 160 (66%); p=0.24) were observed.
conclusionsAccurate EMDC recognition of stroke suspicion alerts to ambulances were associated with a reduction in time until treatment and increased intravenous thrombolysis rates. A significant proportion of patients who had a stroke were not identified by the dispatcher. Improving dispatcher stroke assessment training, tools and knowledge may reduce time delays, thus improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.