ArticleJACC. Asia2025
A Multicenter Feasibility and Safety Study of a Novel Hybrid IVUS-OCT Imaging System.
Article in JACC. Asia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04617899 (The Study to Evaluate the Performance and Safety of the Novasight Hybrid System Using Objective Performance Criteria), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Study to Evaluate the Performance and Safety of the Novasight Hybrid System Using Objective Performance Criteria
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- From intravascular imaging to adaptive vascular care: intelligent photonics and digital twins in panvascular disease.Light, science & applications · 2026Review
- Intravascular Imaging to Predict the Coronary No-Reflow and Slow-Flow Phenomena: Advances and Perspectives.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Intravascular Imaging Guidance for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- From Vision to Illumination: The Promethean Journey of Optical Coherence Tomography in Cardiology.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Intracoronary Optical Coherence Tomography: Technological Innovations and Clinical Implications in Cardiology.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Currently, precise stent manipulation and placement in percutaneous coronary intervention remain compromised. Intravascular imaging techniques are often limited by either spatial resolution or depth of penetration. A hybrid intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-optical coherence tomography (OCT) system would be a better choice for interventional cardiologists. To validate the image quality and safety of the novel IVUS-OCT system for guiding coronary intervention in Chinese patients, a total of 114 cases were included. The proportion of clear imaging length was 96.21% ± 10.16%. Device success rate was 99.1%, technical success rate was 98.2%, and excellent image rate was 96.5%. No catheter-related adverse events occurred, and the incidence of device defects was 0.9%. This study preliminarily verified the image quality and safety of the novel Hybrid IVUS and OCT imaging system. (The StUdy to Evaluate the Performance and safEty of the Novasight HybRid System Using Objective PeRformance Criteria [SUPERIOR]; NCT04617899).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.