Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40049375›Full record

ArticleAnnals of epidemiology2025

Utilization of locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) regression to estimate missing weights in a longitudinal cohort of breast cancer patients.

Alexa Zimbalist, Kelly H Radimer, Isaac J Ergas, Janise M Roh, Charles P Quesenberry, Marilyn L Kwan, Lawrence H Kushi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alexa ZimbalistDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 4480 Hacienda Drive, Pleasanton, CA 94588, United States. Electronic address: alexa.x.zimbalist@kp.org.
Kelly H RadimerDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 4480 Hacienda Drive, Pleasanton, CA 94588, United States.
Isaac J ErgasDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 4480 Hacienda Drive, Pleasanton, CA 94588, United States.
Janise M RohDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 4480 Hacienda Drive, Pleasanton, CA 94588, United States.
Charles P QuesenberryDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 4480 Hacienda Drive, Pleasanton, CA 94588, United States.
Marilyn L KwanDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 4480 Hacienda Drive, Pleasanton, CA 94588, United States.
Lawrence H KushiDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 4480 Hacienda Drive, Pleasanton, CA 94588, United States.

Funding

Prospective Study of Breast Cancer SurvivorshipR01CA105274 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI KUSHI, LAWRENCE H · 2004 to 2014
$19.9M
Infrastructure for Pathways, a Prospective Study of Breast Cancer SurvivorshipU01CA195565 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI AMBROSONE, CHRISTINE B., KUSHI, LAWRENCE H · 2016 to 2025
$18.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA105274NCI NIH HHS U01 CA195565
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTraditional methods to handle missing data rely on making assumptions about missing data patterns. Locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) regression models were explored as a data-driven option to minimize missing weight data in a longitudinal cohort of breast cancer patients.

methodsOutpatient weights from 2 years prior to breast cancer diagnosis to 10 years post were extracted from electronic health records for 10,778 women with invasive breast cancer diagnosed from 2005-2013 at Kaiser Permanente. LOESS regression models estimated weights at baseline (breast cancer diagnosis) and 6 follow-up time points (6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 months post-baseline). The weights identified by the LOESS models were compared with those identified by the closest-available method, in which the weight measurement closest to each timepoint within a specified time window was selected.

resultsCompared with the closest-available method, LOESS models identified fewer weights at baseline and 6 months post, but significantly more weights at later follow-up periods. At all timepoints, more than 80% of the weights identified by both approaches differed by 2.50 kilograms or less.

conclusionsLOESS regression makes effective use of available longitudinal data and may be a beneficial tool to minimize missing longitudinal data in future EHR-based studies.

Indexed as

Body WeightBreast NeoplasmsAdultAgedElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMiddle AgedRegression AnalysisBreast cancerLocally estimated scatterplot smoothingLongitudinal dataMissing dataWeight data

Identifiers

PMID40049375
PMCPMC11972875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.