ArticleAnnals of epidemiology2025
Utilization of locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) regression to estimate missing weights in a longitudinal cohort of breast cancer patients.
Article in Annals of epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrative Transcriptional and Chromatin Analyses Reveal Enhancer-Mediated Regulatory Programs Driving Breast Cancer Metastasis.Molecular cancer research : MCR · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Ischemic Stroke Lesion Segmentation: A Narrative Review of Deep Learning Methods, Clinical Utility, and Future Directions.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Review
- LOESS-Based Cephalometric Growth Curves for Clinical Assessment of Craniofacial Development: A Cross-Sectional Study.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Assessing HPAI-H5 transmission risk across wild bird migratory flyways in the United States.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Longitudinal Change in Renal Function During and After Perioperative Chemotherapy of Nephroureterectomy in Patients With Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.Cancer diagnosis & prognosisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionTraditional methods to handle missing data rely on making assumptions about missing data patterns. Locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) regression models were explored as a data-driven option to minimize missing weight data in a longitudinal cohort of breast cancer patients.
methodsOutpatient weights from 2 years prior to breast cancer diagnosis to 10 years post were extracted from electronic health records for 10,778 women with invasive breast cancer diagnosed from 2005-2013 at Kaiser Permanente. LOESS regression models estimated weights at baseline (breast cancer diagnosis) and 6 follow-up time points (6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 months post-baseline). The weights identified by the LOESS models were compared with those identified by the closest-available method, in which the weight measurement closest to each timepoint within a specified time window was selected.
resultsCompared with the closest-available method, LOESS models identified fewer weights at baseline and 6 months post, but significantly more weights at later follow-up periods. At all timepoints, more than 80% of the weights identified by both approaches differed by 2.50 kilograms or less.
conclusionsLOESS regression makes effective use of available longitudinal data and may be a beneficial tool to minimize missing longitudinal data in future EHR-based studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.