ArticleMagnetic resonance imaging2025
A single oscillating waveform-based gradient delay estimation.
Article in Magnetic resonance imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiple-TE Based Blood-Brain-Barrier Water Exchange Time Measurement Using a TE-Resolved 3D TSE Stack-Of-Spirals Readout.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- MUSIC: Multi-coil unified sparsity regularization using inter-slice correlation for arterial spin labeling MRI denoising.Pattern recognition letters · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWe present a time efficient method to estimate gradient delay using a single oscillating waveform.
methodsSingle oscillating waveform-based gradient delay estimation algorithm (SODA) was proposed. It estimated gradient delays by measuring the relative shifts of echoes acquired at consecutive time points. An acceleration was achieved by a three spin-echo sequence acquiring measurements for all gradient channels within a single excitation. Simulations and phantom experiments were carried out to compare SODA with a reference method. In addition, we monitored the change of the gradient delay over time using an integrated sequence with high gradient amplitude on a 3 T scanner. High-resolution imaging was performed for phantom and in vivo studies to compare images quality with and without gradient delay correction (GDC).
resultsSimulations showed no significant difference in gradient delay estimates when comparing SODA with the reference method for noise levels 1 to 5. The phantom results confirmed strong agreements on delay estimates between SODA with the three spin-echo sequence and the reference method with six pulse repetitions. The gradient delays were observed nearly consistent over time for the scanner. For high-resolution imaging, the reconstruction with GDC exhibit sharper and clearer depictions of images structures than reconstruction without GDC.
conclusionSODA can provide accurate gradient delay estimates with short calibration scan time. The three spin-echo sequence can be seamlessly integrated with any host sequence to measure the gradient delay and provide accurate spiral trajectory. It may be a valuable tool for gradient delay correction in spiral imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.