ArticleTranslational oncology2025
Evaluation of a novel ensemble model for preoperative ovarian cancer diagnosis: Clinical factors, O-RADS, and deep learning radiomics.
Article in Translational oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal Deep Learning Based on Ultrasound Images and Clinical Data for Better Ovarian Cancer Diagnosis.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- A review of ovarian-adnexal reporting and data system and radiomics in ovarian cancer: focus on ultrasound applications.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- The Current Research Landscape on Integrating Artificial Intelligence with Ultrasound Imaging for Cancer Diagnosis: A Dual-Database Bibliometric Study.Current medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate early diagnosis of ovarian cancer is crucial. The objective of this research is to create a comprehensive model that merges clinical variables, O-RADS, and deep learning radiomics to support preoperative diagnosis and assess its efficacy for sonographers. MATERIALS AND
methodsData from two centers were used: Center 1 for training and internal validation, and Center 2 for external validation. DL and radiomics features were extracted from transvaginal ultrasound images to create a DL radiomics model using the LASSO method. A machine learning model ensemble was created by merging clinical variables, O-RADS scores, and DL radiomics model predictions. The model's effectiveness was evaluated by measuring the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and analyzing its impact on improving the diagnostic skills of sonographers. Moreover, the model's additional usefulness was assessed through integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), net reclassification improvement (NRI), and subgroup analysis.
resultsThe ensemble model demonstrated superior diagnostic performance for ovarian cancer compared to standalone clinical models and clinical O-RADS models. Notably, there were significant improvements in the NRI and IDI across all three datasets, with p-values < 0.05. The ensemble model exhibited exceptional diagnostic performance, achieving AUCs of 0.97 in both the internal and external validation sets. Moreover, the implementation of this ensemble model substantially improved the diagnostic precision and reliability of sonographers. The sonographers' average AUC improved by 11 % in the internal validation set and by 7.7 % in the external validation set.
conclusionsThe ensemble model significantly enhances preoperative ovarian cancer diagnosis accuracy and improves sonographers' diagnostic capabilities and consistency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.