Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40048985›Full record

ArticleTranslational oncology2025

Evaluation of a novel ensemble model for preoperative ovarian cancer diagnosis: Clinical factors, O-RADS, and deep learning radiomics.

Yimin Wu, Lifang Fan, Haixin Shao, Jiale Li, Weiwei Yin, Jing Yin, Weiyu Zhu, Pingyang Zhang, Chaoxue Zhang, Junli Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yimin WuDepartment of Ultrasound, WuHu Hospital, East China Normal University (The Second People's Hospital WuHu), Wuhu, PR China.
Lifang FanSchool of Medical Imageology, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, PR China.
Haixin ShaoDepartment of Ultrasound, WuHu Hospital, East China Normal University (The Second People's Hospital WuHu), Wuhu, PR China.
Jiale LiDepartment of Ultrasound, WuHu Hospital, East China Normal University (The Second People's Hospital WuHu), Wuhu, PR China.
Weiwei YinDepartment of Ultrasound, WuHu Hospital, East China Normal University (The Second People's Hospital WuHu), Wuhu, PR China.
Jing YinDepartment of Ultrasound, WuHu Hospital, East China Normal University (The Second People's Hospital WuHu), Wuhu, PR China.
Weiyu ZhuDepartment of Ultrasound, WuHu Hospital, East China Normal University (The Second People's Hospital WuHu), Wuhu, PR China.
Pingyang ZhangDepartment of Echocardiography, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, PR China. Electronic address: zhpy28@126.com.
Chaoxue ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, PR China. Electronic address: zcxay@163.com.
Junli WangDepartment of Ultrasound, WuHu Hospital, East China Normal University (The Second People's Hospital WuHu), Wuhu, PR China. Electronic address: wjl980134@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate early diagnosis of ovarian cancer is crucial. The objective of this research is to create a comprehensive model that merges clinical variables, O-RADS, and deep learning radiomics to support preoperative diagnosis and assess its efficacy for sonographers. MATERIALS AND

methodsData from two centers were used: Center 1 for training and internal validation, and Center 2 for external validation. DL and radiomics features were extracted from transvaginal ultrasound images to create a DL radiomics model using the LASSO method. A machine learning model ensemble was created by merging clinical variables, O-RADS scores, and DL radiomics model predictions. The model's effectiveness was evaluated by measuring the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and analyzing its impact on improving the diagnostic skills of sonographers. Moreover, the model's additional usefulness was assessed through integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), net reclassification improvement (NRI), and subgroup analysis.

resultsThe ensemble model demonstrated superior diagnostic performance for ovarian cancer compared to standalone clinical models and clinical O-RADS models. Notably, there were significant improvements in the NRI and IDI across all three datasets, with p-values < 0.05. The ensemble model exhibited exceptional diagnostic performance, achieving AUCs of 0.97 in both the internal and external validation sets. Moreover, the implementation of this ensemble model substantially improved the diagnostic precision and reliability of sonographers. The sonographers' average AUC improved by 11 % in the internal validation set and by 7.7 % in the external validation set.

conclusionsThe ensemble model significantly enhances preoperative ovarian cancer diagnosis accuracy and improves sonographers' diagnostic capabilities and consistency.

Indexed as

Deep learningO-RADSOvarian cancerRadiomicsTransvaginal ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID40048985
PMCPMC11928997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.