Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40048671›Full record

ArticleJCO precision oncology2025

Incorporating Circulating Tumor DNA Testing Into Clinical Trials: A Position Paper by the National Cancer Institute GI Oncology Circulating Tumor DNA Working Group.

Lakshmi Rajdev, Gentry G King, Christopher H Lieu, Stacey A Cohen, Shubham Pant, Nataliya V Uboha, Dustin Deming, Midhun Malla, Anup Kasi, Kelsey Klute and 21 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in JCO precision oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. ctDNA in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Critical Appraisal.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

Lakshmi RajdevIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
Gentry G KingFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.ORCID 0000-0002-7525-8802
Christopher H LieuUniversity of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO.ORCID 0000-0002-4852-4642
Stacey A CohenFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Shubham PantMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Nataliya V UbohaUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
Dustin DemingUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.ORCID 0000-0003-2394-9836
Midhun MallaUniversity of Alabama, Birmingham, AL.ORCID 0000-0002-9969-588X
Anup KasiUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS.ORCID 0000-0002-4305-5701
Kelsey KluteUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE.ORCID 0000-0002-4748-8520
Kristen R SpencerNew York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0001-5577-3439
Arvind DasariMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0001-5271-9744
Van K MorrisMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-4911-2252
Gregory BottaUniversity of California San Diego, San Diego, CA.ORCID 0000-0001-9606-4508
Andrew M LowyUniversity of California San Diego, San Diego, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-7106-0735
Mark H O'HaraUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID 0000-0003-2751-6122
Jennifer EadsUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID 0000-0002-0491-4518
Daniel KingFeinstein Institutes for Medical Research Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY.ORCID 0000-0001-6451-712X
Manish A ShahWeil-Cornell Medical College New York Presbyterian, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-6913-9655
Theodore S HongMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0001-8481-6581
Aparna ParikhMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-5245-7841
Samuel J KlempnerMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-4062-0808
Salma K JabbourRutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.ORCID 0000-0001-8200-5371
Akhil ChawlaFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.ORCID 0000-0003-3122-6873
Daniela MolenaMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0003-1655-4473
Thomas J GeorgeUniversity of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville, FL.ORCID 0000-0002-6249-9180
Michael K GibsonDivision Hematology & Oncology, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN.ORCID 0000-0002-1500-9281
Carmen AllegraNational Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
Karyn GoodmanIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-4576-6355
Cathy EngDivision Hematology & Oncology, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN.ORCID 0000-0003-2335-0612
Philip A PhilipWayne State University, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI.ORCID 0000-0002-6513-3491

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Tumor Biology and Microenvironment (Program 1)P30CA022453 · NCI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PAUL M STEMMER · 1985 to 2026
$68.4M
Dr. Salma Jabbour’s NCI Research Specialist (Clinician Scientist) Award (R50)R50CA275877 · NCI · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Salma Jabbour · 2023 to 2026
$785k
NCI-sponsored Clinical Trial Research SpecialistR50CA281930 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI Thomas J. George · 2023 to 2026
$461k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA022453NCI NIH HHS R50 CA275877NCI NIH HHS R50 CA281930
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCirculating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is an emerging tool in the evaluation of GI cancers. Challenges remain in defining its utility and role as a primary end point in therapeutic trials. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) ctDNA GI working group was created to evaluate current data and provide guidance on the inclusion of ctDNA in GI cancer trials.

methodsThe NCI GI steering committee assigned four task force members to serve as co-chairs for the working group. Co-chairs identified experts within each GI disease group to form a panel that convened to review data and provide recommendations. The group focused on ctDNA's role as a potential surrogate for assessing prognosis and guiding treatment decisions that may enhance GI cancer trials. A manuscript was drafted, circulated, revised, and voted on by the panel. The final draft was reviewed by the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program.

resultsFurther data are required to support ctDNA as a primary end point for late-phase therapeutic trials, particularly in studies that could change the standard-of-care. However, the group supports ctDNA as a primary efficacy end point for phase II studies and as a noninvasive evaluation strategy for new drug development. Incorporation of ctDNA as a biomarker in trial design must consider the specific context of disease biology of the GI cancer subtypes. ctDNA should be incorporated as an exploratory end point across a variety of disease settings and indications. Several practical considerations were identified to optimize the incorporation of ctDNA in future trial design.

conclusionProspective trials are required to clarify the role of ctDNA as a valid surrogate end point for progression-free or overall survival in GI cancers.

Indexed as

Circulating Tumor DNAClinical Trials as TopicGastrointestinal NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorHumansNational Cancer Institute (U.S.)United StatesBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNA

Identifiers

PMID40048671
PMCPMC11893001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.