ArticlePloS one2025
The impact of extended reality cognitive behavioral therapy on mental disorders among children and youth: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Biosensor-Integrated Virtual Reality for Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Psychosis: A Systematic Review of a New Therapeutic Frontier.Biosensors · 2026Pooled it
- Advancing Undergraduate Student Mental Healthcare of Social Anxiety Disorder: Evaluating the Acceptance of AR-Assisted Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Through TAM-Based Constructs.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe prevalence of mental disorders among children and youth has significantly increased, with rising rates of anxiety, depression, and other psychological disorders globally. Despite the widespread adoption of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) as a standardized treatment for various mental disorders, its efficacy can be constrained due to limited patient engagement, lack of commitment, and stigma, all challenges pronounced among children and youth. In this context, extended reality (XR) technologies (including virtual, augmented, and mixed reality) have emerged as innovative therapeutic tools offering immersive and engaging environments to overcome the limitations of traditional CBT.
objectivesThis protocol aims to outline the methodology for conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of XR-CBT on symptoms of mental disorders among children and youth.
methodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis will follow PRISMA-P 2015 guidelines. A comprehensive search will be conducted in PsycINFO, PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify relevant studies published between January 2014 and June 2024. Eligible studies must involve children and youth (ages 24 years or younger) diagnosed with a mental disorder (e.g., anxiety, depression, ADHD, PTSD) and compare XR-CBT interventions (virtual, augmented, or mixed reality) with traditional therapy or control groups (e.g., no treatment). The primary outcome will be the change in symptoms of mental disorders, measured using standardized instruments (e.g., PHQ-9, GAD-7, PSS). Data will be extracted on post-intervention means, standard deviations, and 95% confidence intervals. Effect sizes, calculated using Hedges' g, will be pooled with a random-effects model. Moreover, an a priori meta-regression within a random-effects framework will be conducted to examine how study-level characteristics influence effect sizes and address heterogeneity across studies. Heterogeneity will be assessed using the I2 statistic and the Cochran's Q test. Risk of bias in individual studies will be evaluated using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool.
conclusionsThis protocol establishes a structured approach for assessing the efficacy of XR-CBT interventions on mental disorders among children and youth. The results of the systematic review and meta-analysis will fill a gap in current research and inform future therapeutic applications for mental health interventions among children and youth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.