Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40048425›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of frailty & aging2025

Changes in frailty predict social vulnerability among home care clients living in the community followed for ten years.

Jasmine C Mah, Melissa K Andrew, Jack Quach, Susan Stevens, Janice Keefe, Kenneth Rockwood, Judith Godin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of frailty & aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jasmine C MahDivision of Geriatric Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada; Geriatric Medicine Research, Dalhousie University and Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. Electronic address: jmah@dal.ca.
Melissa K AndrewDivision of Geriatric Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada; Geriatric Medicine Research, Dalhousie University and Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Jack QuachGeriatric Medicine Research, Dalhousie University and Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Susan StevensDepartment of Family Studies and Gerontology, Mount Saint Vincent University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Janice KeefeDepartment of Family Studies and Gerontology, Mount Saint Vincent University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Kenneth RockwoodDivision of Geriatric Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada; Geriatric Medicine Research, Dalhousie University and Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Judith GodinDivision of Geriatric Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada; Geriatric Medicine Research, Dalhousie University and Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmong community dwelling older adults, social vulnerability increases with age. Advanced age alone does not fully explain how or why older adults become more socially vulnerable; frailty may offer a better explanation.

objectiveWe aimed to understand how change in frailty relates to change in social vulnerability over time.

designRetrospective cohort study. SETTING AND

participantsWe analyzed older adults aged 65 years and older from the province of Nova Scotia who accessed publicly funded home care in 2005 and 2008 followed for up to ten years. MEASUREMENTS: We measured social vulnerability and frailty using indices. Controlling for time constant covariates, multi-level growth modelling was used to evaluate whether within-person changes in frailty were associated with within person changes in social vulnerability, after accounting for between-person differences.

resultsThere were 2,791 older adults in the 2005 cohort and 2,741 older adults in the 2008 cohort. Mean age, frailty index and social vulnerability index were 80.6 years (SD 7.5), 0.23 (SD 0.10), 0.22 (SD 0.07) and 80.4 (SD 7.6), 0.23 (SD 0.10), and 0.23 (SD 0.07) for each cohort respectively. After accounting for age, sex and baseline frailty, a 0.1 point increase in change of FI from baseline was associated with a 0.017 (CI 0.016 - 0.019, p < 0.001) increase in SVI in the 2005 cohort and a 0.014 (CI 0.013 - 0.016, p < 0.001) increase in SVI in the 2008 cohort.

conclusionsAlthough social vulnerability tends to remain constant in the absence of increases in frailty, changes in frailty are closely associated with changes in social vulnerability. Incorporating within-person changes in health into quantitative models of late-life social vulnerability may further improve our understanding of how and why some individuals are able to stay in the community despite their vulnerabilities.

Indexed as

Frail ElderlyFrailtyHome Care ServicesIndependent LivingSocial VulnerabilityAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansMaleNova ScotiaRetrospective StudiesVulnerable PopulationsAgingCommunity carefrailtyLong-term careRAI-HCSocial vulnerability

Identifiers

PMID40048425
PMCPMC12184035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.