Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40048196›Full record

ReviewJAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery2025

Current Progress and Future Directions of Immunotherapy in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Narrative Review.

Edward S Sim, Hoang C B Nguyen, Glenn J Hanna, Ravindra Uppaluri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Systemic inflammation plays a key prognostic role in patients with head and neck cancer treated with immunotherapy and is linked to CT-based body composition metrics.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Edward S SimDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Hoang C B NguyenDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Glenn J HannaCenter for Head and Neck Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ravindra UppaluriDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING IN OTOLARYNGOLOGYT32DC000020 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI JUNG, DAVID H, SIMONYAN, KRISTINA · 1990 to 2025
$2.4M
NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: For decades, the 3 therapeutic pillars for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) have been radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and surgery. In recent years, a fourth pillar, immunotherapy, has shifted the existing paradigm of oncologic care by improving survival outcomes. This narrative review highlights key completed and ongoing clinical trials that have led to new therapeutic approaches and are aiming to further alter the current standard of care. Observations: Immunotherapy in HNSCC first saw success in phase 3 clinical trials with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for programmed cell death 1 protein in patients with recurrent or metastatic (R/M) disease. However, only approximately 15% to 20% of patients with R/M HNSCC achieve durable responses. Subsequent trials aimed to broaden ICIs to the definitive or curative setting, in combination with established chemoradiation modalities. These studies have yielded disappointing results, raising concerns that concurrent administration of ICI with chemoradiation- or radiation-induced attenuation of immune responses may contribute to lack of efficacy. Therefore, recent studies have attempted to introduce ICI sequentially, either prior to standard of care surgery in the neoadjuvant setting or following definitive treatment in the adjuvant or maintenance setting. These trials have demonstrated mixed results but with promising initial results from early phase neoadjuvant trials demonstrating early signals of response. Further trials are currently underway with various combinatorial approaches in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings to assess response rates and survival. Conclusions and Relevance: The introduction of ICIs has brought a dramatic shift in the treatment landscape of HNSCC. Completed trials have provided new hope for patients, but failures in several settings suggest that further studies based on a biologic understanding of immune responses are required to expand immunotherapeutic approaches.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunotherapySquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckHumansImmune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID40048196
PMCPMC12815376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.