ArticleJournal of vision2025
Flash grab effect within the regions of modal and amodal completions.
Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When a rotating grating reverses its direction and is accompanied by a briefly flashed stimulus on top, the flash's apparent position shifts in direction after the reversal. This phenomenon, termed the flash-grab effect, can induce an illusory position shift of several degrees of visual angle, prompting investigation into scenarios in which the expected position coincides with another visual event. We investigated two such situations: perceptual filling-in at the blind spot and amodal completion behind a visible occluder. By inducing a position shift in the flash presented just outside such completed patterns, we measured the perceived angular position of the flash in the perceptual matching paradigm. We found subjective localization within the completed region of the moving inducer. Consistent results were found even when the flash was presented at a less optimal time for the flash-grab effect. Illusion size had a certain dependency on stimulus configuration, suggesting that various sources of spatial referencing are involved in the position processing around the blind-spot/occluder region. These findings imply that the visual system does not necessarily avoid a region that is devoid of physical motion stimuli when determining perceived flash position, reaching a consistent perceptual solution that integrates the motion-induced position shift and perceptual completion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.