ArticleJAMA network open2025
Trends in Respiratory Pathogen Testing at US Children's Hospitals.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of a diagnostic stewardship intervention to de-implement widespread use of a rapid respiratory multiplex PCR test.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Variation in management of febrile infants younger than 90 days across London: a retrospective cohort study.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Article
- Pathogen trends and paradigm shifts of respiratory infections in children: a 5-year retrospective study from Perugia.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on phototherapy usage for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Article
- Real-World Utility of the Host-Response MeMed BV Test in a Pediatric Emergency Department: A Non-Randomized Study with Optimized Antimicrobial and Diagnostic Stewardship.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- From lockdown to recovery: changing patterns of viral infection severity in a pediatric cohort with asthma.Frontiers in allergy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Respiratory pathogen testing has been a common deimplementation focus. The COVID-19 pandemic brought new considerations for respiratory testing; recent trends in testing rates are not well understood. Objective: To measure trends in respiratory testing among encounters for acute respiratory infections among children and adolescents (aged <18 years) from 2016 to 2023, assess the association of COVID-19 with these trends, and describe associated cost trends. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective serial cross-sectional study included emergency department (ED) encounters and hospitalizations in US children's hospitals among children and adolescents with a primary acute infectious respiratory illness diagnosis. Data were ascertained from the Pediatric Health Information System database from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2023. Exposure: Respiratory pathogen testing. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the percentage of encounters with respiratory testing over time. Interrupted time series models were created to assess the association of COVID-19 with testing patterns. The inflation-adjusted standardized unit cost associated with respiratory testing was also examined. Results: There were 5 090 923 eligible encounters among patients who were children or adolescents (mean [SD] age, 3.36 [4.06] years); 55.0% of the patients were male. Among these encounters, 87.5% were ED only, 77.9% involved children younger than 6 years, and 94.5% involved children without complex chronic conditions. Respiratory testing was performed in 37.2% of all encounters. The interrupted time series models demonstrated increasing prepandemic testing rates in both ED-only encounters (slope, 0.26 [95% CI, 0.21-0.30]; P < .001) and hospitalizations (slope, 0.12 [95% CI, 0.07-0.16]; P < .001). Increases in respiratory testing were seen at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in both ED-only encounters (level change, 33.78 [95% CI, 31.77-35.79]; P < .001) and hospitalizations (level change, 30.97 [95% CI, 29.21-32.73]; P < .001), associated initially with COVID-19-only testing. Postpandemic testing rates remained elevated relative to prepandemic levels. The percentage of encounters with respiratory testing increased from 13.6% [95% CI, 13.5%-13.7%] in 2016 to a peak of 62.2% [95% CI, 62.1%-62.3%] in 2022. While COVID-19-only testing decreased after 2020, other targeted testing and large-panel (>5 targets) testing increased. The inflation-adjusted standardized unit cost associated with respiratory testing increased from $34.2 [95% CI, $33.9-$34.6] per encounter in 2017 to $128.2 [95% CI, $127.7-$128.6] per encounter in 2022. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cross-sectional study suggest that respiratory testing rates have increased over time, with large increases at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic that have persisted. Respiratory testing rates and related costs increased significantly, supporting a need for future deimplementation efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.