ArticleWorld journal of pediatrics : WJP2025
Adherence to 24-hour movement guidelines in adolescence and its association with lower risk of hypertension in adulthood.
Article in World journal of pediatrics : WJP, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- International Study of Movement Behaviours in the Early Years (SUNRISE): A Pilot Study From Ecuador.Child: care, health and development · 2026Article
- Role of the Intensity of Habitual Physical Activity in the Maintenance of Normal Blood Pressure: Findings From the SUN Longitudinal Cohort Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Observational
- Development of a 24-hour movement index: exploring acceptability among Canadian parents.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
- Association of childhood-to-adolescence body mass index trajectories with elevated blood pressure and elevated carotid intima-media thickness.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is limited research on how adherence to 24 h movement guidelines from adolescence to adulthood affects long-term hypertension outcomes. This study examined the association between sustained adherence to these guidelines and hypertension risk.
methodsAnalysis was done on data from adolescents 12- to 19-year-olds who took part in Waves I and V of the Add Health Study. Physical activity (PA), screen time, and sleep duration were assessed through self-report questionnaires. Blood pressure (BP) was assessed on the right arm following a 5 min seated rest, utilizing an oscillometric device, and hypertension was defined as systolic/diastolic BP ≥ 140/90 mmHg, physician-diagnosed hypertension, or current antihypertensive medication use.
resultsThis prospective study included a total of 3076 participants (60.3% female), and 802 were diagnosed with hypertension. Meeting sleep duration guidelines at Wave I was associated with reductions in systolic [- 0.568 mmHg, 95% bias-corrected and accelerated (BCa) confident interval (CI) - 2.128 to - 0.011, P = 0.044] and diastolic (- 0.331 mmHg, 95% BCa CI - 1.506 to - 0.071, P = 0.043) BP at Wave V. Adherence to PA and sleep duration guidelines at both waves further reduced BP, with the greatest decreases observed among participants meeting all three guidelines: systolic (- 6.184 mmHg, 95% BCa CI - 13.45 to - 0.915, P = 0.040) and diastolic BP (- 3.156 mmHg, 95% BCa CI - 6.413 to - 0.120, P = 0.047). The risk of hypertension was lower among those who met the PA guidelines individually [relative risk (RR) 0.710, 95% CI 0.516-0.976, P = 0.035] or adhered to all three recommendations (RR 0.699, 95% CI 0.311-0.899, P = 0.030) in both waves.
conclusionsOur findings highlight the cardiovascular benefits of consistently adhering to healthy movement behaviors from adolescence through adulthood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.