ArticleCJEM2025
Exploring the perspectives of non-insured individuals utilizing emergency departments in Toronto: a qualitative study.
Article in CJEM, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Co-Design of strategies to enhance access to Virtual Urgent Care models by equity-deserving populations.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveNon-insured individuals face unique challenges when accessing emergency department (ED) care in Canada. This qualitative study explores the firsthand experiences of non-insured patients within the ED to understand how we can improve the system of care.
methodsThis community-based research was conducted in collaboration with a community health center which has multiple service locations in Toronto, Ontario. 24 non-insured participants were recruited using a maximal variation sampling technique for semi-structured individual interviews. Participants must have received care as a patient in an ED in the last 3 years. We analyzed the data using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis framework.
resultsInterview participants felt unwanted and powerless, and faced health system navigation and access challenges. Subthemes include the anxiety of uncertainty regarding how to pay for ED care as well as concerns regarding insurance eligibility, healthcare access points, and language. Non-insured participants experienced stigma and discrimination; delayed care due to a lack of healthcare coverage; and difficulties with the ED registration and triage processes. The study also identified multiple instances where participants had positive experiences with clinicians and devised creative solutions to tackle challenges by engaging informal community networks and self-advocacy.
conclusionWays to improve the ED care of non-insured patients include providing ED care for all regardless of their healthcare coverage status, ameliorating clerical training, outlining clearer policies regarding payments, improving health system navigation, and fostering connections to community organizations. Many of the challenges that non-insured patients face may be applicable to other equity-deserving patient groups. By listening to and learning from the experiences of non-insured patients, a more equitable ED system can be built for this marginalized population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40048075What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.