ArticleResearch on child and adolescent psychopathology2025
No Impaired Inhibition of Stimulus-Driven Behavior in Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: a Partial Test of the Habit Formation Model.
Article in Research on child and adolescent psychopathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The mechanisms that underlie obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are elusive. The habit formation model of OCD postulates that compulsions arise from an imbalance between goal-directed and habit formation systems, stemming from impaired inhibition of stimulus-driven actions. Few studies have examined the core tenets of the habit formation model in pediatric OCD. We administered the object-interference task, which assesses the ability to inhibit stimulus-driven behavior, to 67 youths with OCD, 43 youths with an anxiety disorder (and no OCD), and 48 youths without any mental disorder. Impaired inhibition of stimulus-driven behavior was calculated by comparing response times to neutral non-nameable objects, neutral nameable objects, distress-eliciting objects, and incompleteness-eliciting objects. Youths with OCD did not differ significantly from youths with anxiety disorders and the non-clinical group on any response cost measure. All groups showed small response costs in relation to all three categories of non-neutral objects, with the clearest cost emerging in relation to distress-eliciting objects. Individual differences in response cost were not significantly correlated with any interview- or self-rated measure of OCD severity. Using the object-interference task, no evidence was found for impaired inhibition of stimulus-driven behavior in youths with OCD. We explore several possible interpretations of this result, including limitations of the task itself, the broader constraints of experimental methods in detecting such mechanisms, and the possibility that an imbalance between goal-directed and habit systems may not be a fundamental feature of pediatric OCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40048035What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.