ArticleAnnals of nuclear medicine2025
Efficacy of [
Article in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Imaging of MASLD: clinical standards and novel methods.Diabetologia · 2026Review
- A pilot human-based study ofScientific reports · 2026Article
- Recent advances in theranostics and oncology PET: emerging radionuclides and targets.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLiver fibrosis is a chronic fibrosing hepatic disorder following recurrent injury, characterized by the excessive accumulation of extracellular matrix. Early detection has a great clinical impact because 80-90% of hepatocellular carcinomas are known to develop in fibrotic or cirrhotic (end-stage fibrotic) livers. PET imaging with FAP ligands exhibited highly promising results in recent years to visualize fibrosis in various organs due to the crucial role of activated fibroblasts in fibrosing processes. However, still little is known about the efficacy of FAP imaging in liver fibrosis. Thus, we sought to investigate the potential of FAPI-PET in a cohort of oncological and non-oncological patients.
methods199 patients who underwent FAPI-PET/CT at the University Hospital of Heidelberg between July 2017 and July 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The tracer uptake of the liver was analyzed and correlated with radiological and clinical parameters.
resultsWe observed a weak but significant negative correlation between the hepatic FAPI uptake and CT density (r = - 0.273, P < 0.001***). A positive correlation was observed between hepatic FAPI uptake and the aspartate aminotransferase (AST)-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) (r = 0.183, P = 0.009**), an established surrogate for liver fibrosis. The liver SUV (standardized uptake value) mean and SUVmax of FAPI showed significant differences between groups of patients with low (< 0.5), middle (0.5-1.0) and higher (> 1.0) levels of APRI (both P < 0.001***).
conclusionThese preliminary observational results suggest that FAPI-PET may be a viable non-invasive method to asses liver fibrosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.