Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40048005›Full record

ReviewCurrent diabetes reports2025

Adapting the NIMHD Research Framework for Type 2 Diabetes-Related Disparities.

Monica Diaz, Morgan E Braxton, Eyitayo O Owolabi, Timian M Godfrey, Mantej Singh, Aliria M Rascón, Gabriel Q Shaibi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current diabetes reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Monica DiazCenter for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, 550 N 3rd Street, Health North Suite 300, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA.
Morgan E BraxtonCenter for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, 550 N 3rd Street, Health North Suite 300, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA.
Eyitayo O OwolabiCenter for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, 550 N 3rd Street, Health North Suite 300, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA.
Timian M GodfreyCenter for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, 550 N 3rd Street, Health North Suite 300, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA.
Mantej SinghCenter for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, 550 N 3rd Street, Health North Suite 300, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA.
Aliria M RascónCenter for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, 550 N 3rd Street, Health North Suite 300, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA.
Gabriel Q ShaibiCenter for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, 550 N 3rd Street, Health North Suite 300, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA. Gabriel.Shaibi@asu.edu.

Funding

NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK107579; R01DK107579-07S1; R01DK107579-08S2NIMHD NIH HHS R01MD014127-04S1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewType 2 diabetes (T2D) disproportionately impacts minority populations. The National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD) developed a research framework to encourage health disparities research that considers a multi-level, multi-domain perspective. The purpose of this review was to describe evidence on the levels and domains that influence T2D disparities among minority populations and use this information to adapt the NIMHD Research Framework for T2D. RECENT

findingsScreening identified 108 articles published between 2017 and 2023 covering 74,354,597 participants. Articles were classified under the following domains, Biological (18), Behavioral (22), Physical/Built Environment (19), Sociocultural Environment (42), and Health Care System (31). Article levels of influence included Individual (73), Interpersonal (18), Community (36), and Societal (10). Findings were used to adapt the NIMHD Research Framework with an eye towards advancing T2D-related health equity. The results of this review confirm the complex nature of T2D-related disparities and support the notion that drivers operate within and between multiple levels and multiple domains to influence T2D-related outcomes across the lifespan.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Healthcare DisparitiesHealth Status DisparitiesHumansMinority GroupsUnited StatesHealth disparityHealth equityMinority and vulnerable populationsMinority healthType 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.