Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40047994›Full record

ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2025

Multicancer Detection (MCD) Testing in Gastrointestinal Cancers: An Evolving Tool for Early Diagnosis.

Aditya K Ghosh, Kyle R Stephens, Prem A Kandiah, Ryan T Hurt, Elizabeth A Gilman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aditya K GhoshDivision of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. ghosh.aditya@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9247-5999
Kyle R StephensUniversity of Louisville School of Medicine, Hiram C. Polk Jr., M.D., Department of Surgery, Louisville, KY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-1479-0580
Prem A KandiahDepartment of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ryan T HurtDivision of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1158-7559
Elizabeth A GilmanDivision of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0166-391X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe current review aims to summarize the benefits and limitations of the novel multicancer detection tests (MCD) for diagnosing gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. RECENT

findingsTraditional cancer screening methods can reduce deaths in malignancies involving the GI tract. For GI cancers, screening options vary by type and often involve invasive techniques with limited sensitivity. MCDs offer a promising, non-invasive (simple blood draw) alternative by analyzing biomarkers such as cell-free DNA and RNA using advanced techniques and machine learning to detect cancers across multiple organ sites. Large studies like the PATHFINDER trial and THUNDER study have demonstrated the feasibility and accuracy of MCD assays in identifying cancer signals, with high sensitivity and specificity in some GI organs that lack routine screening tests (e.g., liver, pancreas, and stomach). Despite these advancements, MCD testing faces challenges, including high costs, lack of FDA approval, false positives, and limited data on clinical utility in reducing cancer-specific mortality. MCD should not be a substitute for age-appropriate cancer screenings but may complement existing methods, particularly for cancers with no current screening tools, such as cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer. Clinicians need to discuss the limitations of MCDs, including the potential for overdiagnosis, patient anxiety, and financial burden due to insurance coverage gaps. MCD is a promising, non-invasive test that can augment traditional cancer screening. As the role of MCD in cancer detection evolves, further research is essential to establish how it will be integrated into clinical practice, ensuring informed, shared decision-making with patients.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorEarly Detection of CancerGastrointestinal NeoplasmsCell-Free Nucleic AcidsHumansSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic AcidsCancer screeningGastrointestinal cancerMulticancer detection (MCD) test

Identifiers

PMID40047994
PMCPMC11885400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.