ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2025
Multicancer Detection (MCD) Testing in Gastrointestinal Cancers: An Evolving Tool for Early Diagnosis.
Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The evolving role of OMICS in gastrointestinal tumor biology and clinical practice.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Detection of Exhaled Volatile Organic Compounds as Noninvasive Biomarkers for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe current review aims to summarize the benefits and limitations of the novel multicancer detection tests (MCD) for diagnosing gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. RECENT
findingsTraditional cancer screening methods can reduce deaths in malignancies involving the GI tract. For GI cancers, screening options vary by type and often involve invasive techniques with limited sensitivity. MCDs offer a promising, non-invasive (simple blood draw) alternative by analyzing biomarkers such as cell-free DNA and RNA using advanced techniques and machine learning to detect cancers across multiple organ sites. Large studies like the PATHFINDER trial and THUNDER study have demonstrated the feasibility and accuracy of MCD assays in identifying cancer signals, with high sensitivity and specificity in some GI organs that lack routine screening tests (e.g., liver, pancreas, and stomach). Despite these advancements, MCD testing faces challenges, including high costs, lack of FDA approval, false positives, and limited data on clinical utility in reducing cancer-specific mortality. MCD should not be a substitute for age-appropriate cancer screenings but may complement existing methods, particularly for cancers with no current screening tools, such as cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer. Clinicians need to discuss the limitations of MCDs, including the potential for overdiagnosis, patient anxiety, and financial burden due to insurance coverage gaps. MCD is a promising, non-invasive test that can augment traditional cancer screening. As the role of MCD in cancer detection evolves, further research is essential to establish how it will be integrated into clinical practice, ensuring informed, shared decision-making with patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.