ArticleClinical rheumatology2025
Patient perspectives on rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: insights from a large-scale survey.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rheumatoid arthritis in the public eye: a study on awareness and knowledge levels in the United Arab Emirates.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Practice patterns and challenges in the referral, diagnosis, management, and monitoring of axial spondyloarthritis: insights from an online survey of rheumatologists.Rheumatology international · 2025Article
- Referral patterns, influencing factors, and satisfaction related to referrals of patients with rheumatic diseases to other healthcare professionals: an online survey of rheumatologists.Rheumatology international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/
objectivesRheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMD) are prevalent among Arabic-speaking patients in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), yet their perspectives remain underexplored. This study examines patient experiences and perspectives.
methodA cross-sectional survey was developed using pilot testing with clinimetric sensibility assessment to ensure clarity and relevance, and the Open-Source Metric for Measuring Arabic Narratives (OSMAN) to assess readability. The Checklist for Reporting Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES) was used to enhance the quality of the survey. The survey was distributed via social media to Arabic-speaking patients with self-reported RMDs. Collected data included demographics, disease characteristics, medication use, treatment satisfaction factors, perceived causes, and patient concerns.
resultsOf the 1050 responses received, 456 were complete and included in the analysis. Most respondents were female (81.4%) and between the ages of 25 and 44 (63.4%). The most frequently reported diseases were systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis. Nearly all (97.1%) used medications within the previous three months, primarily hydroxychloroquine, glucocorticoids, and biologics. Key factors influencing treatment satisfaction were pain relief, laboratory result discussions, sleep quality, and mood improvement. Patients perceived immune system abnormalities (76.5%), psychological factors (54.8%), and genetics (41.7%) as primary disease causes. Main concerns included fear of disease complications, adverse drug reactions, and being a burden to others. Rheumatologists and internet search engines were the primary sources of information for patients. Most avoided alternative medicine, while 33.3% used it.
conclusionThis survey is the first and largest in the MENA region, providing valuable insights into patient perspectives on RMD. It highlights the need for holistic management, enhanced education, and supportive services to improve quality of life. Key Points • The most commonly perceived causes of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases among patients with RMD were immune system abnormalities, psychological factors, genetic/hereditary influences, and envy. • Patients' top concerns included fear of future complications, adverse drug reactions, becoming a burden to others, physical disability, and issues related to marriage and childbirth. • Key factors influencing treatment satisfaction included pain relief, discussions of laboratory results, sleep quality, and mood improvement. • Approximately one-third of patients had consulted practitioners of complementary and alternative medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40047988What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.