Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40047954›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical ecology2025

Impact of Nectar Composition and Nectar Yeasts on Volatile Emissions and Parasitoid Behavior.

Islam S Sobhy, Tim Goelen, Felix Wäckers, Kevin J Verstrepen, Tom Wenseleers, Hans Jacquemyn, Bart Lievens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Islam S SobhyCMPG Laboratory for Process Microbial Ecology and Bioinspirational Management (PME&BIM), Department of Microbial and Molecular Systems, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. sobhyi@cardiff.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4984-1823
Tim GoelenCMPG Laboratory for Process Microbial Ecology and Bioinspirational Management (PME&BIM), Department of Microbial and Molecular Systems, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0034-6197
Felix Wäckers, Biobest, Westerlo, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9748-0615
Kevin J VerstrepenVIB - KU Leuvain Center for Microbiology, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3077-6219
Tom WenseleersLaboratory of Socio-Ecology & Social Evolution, Biology Department, KU Leuven, Leuvain, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1434-861X
Hans JacquemynLaboratory of Plant Conservation and Population Biology, Biology Department, KU Leuven, Leuvain, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9600-5794
Bart LievensCMPG Laboratory for Process Microbial Ecology and Bioinspirational Management (PME&BIM), Department of Microbial and Molecular Systems, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. bart.lievens@kuleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7698-6641

Funding

KU Leuven C3 grant (IOF-C32/15/020)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nectar yeasts can significantly influence the scent of floral nectar and therefore the foraging behavior of flower-visiting insects. While these effects likely depend on nectar chemistry and yeast species, their joint impact on nectar volatile profiles and associated insect responses remain poorly understood. Here, we used four synthetic nectar types varying in sugar and amino acid concentration and two specialist nectar yeasts (Metschnikowia gruessii and Metschnikowia reukaufii) to investigate how nectar composition and yeast species affect volatile profiles and the olfactory responses of the generalist aphid parasitoid Aphidius ervi. Olfactometer assays showed that A. ervi females significantly preferred fermented nectars with high amino acid-low sugar content (HL) and low amino acid-high sugar (LH) content, regardless being fermented by M. gruessii or M. reukaufii, over non-inoculated nectars. This effect was not observed for nectars with low amino acid-low sugar (LL) and high amino acid-high sugar (HH) content. Moreover, LL nectar fermented with M. gruessii became even repellent to the parasitoids. GC-MS analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) revealed that VOC profiles of fermented nectars depended significantly on nectar type (i.e., chemical composition), yeast species, and their interaction. Whereas propyl acetate, isobutyl acetate, styrene, α-guaiene and pentyl-octanoate were associated with the LH fermented nectars, ethyl acetate and E-methyl isoeugenol were mainly associated with the HL fermented nectars, suggesting possible involvement in A. ervi attraction to these nectars. In contrast, isopropyl-hexadecanoate was associated with the non-attractive or repellent LL fermented nectars. Altogether, our results indicate that nectar composition has a strong impact on nectar scent when fermented by specialist nectar yeasts and subsequently on insect foraging behavior.

Indexed as

AphidsMetschnikowiaPlant NectarVolatile Organic CompoundsWaspsYeastsAmino AcidsAnimalsFemaleFermentationGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryAmino AcidsPlant NectarVolatile Organic CompoundsAphidius erviMetschnikowia gruessiiMetschnikowia reukaufiiMicrobial volatilesOlfactory responsePest management

Identifiers

PMID40047954
PMCPMC11885403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.