ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2025
Evaluation of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery of small intestinal neuroendocrine tumours as an alternative surgical treatment to open surgery.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Surgeon's Hand: The Most Sensitive Instrument in Detection of Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors.ANZ journal of surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSmall intestinal neuroendocrine tumours (SI-NETs) are the most common malignancy of the small bowel. Curative treatment is surgical, with exploratory laparotomy considered the standard approach. This study aimed to assess the outcomes of minimally invasive surgery compared to open approach for SI-NETs at the Endocrine surgical unit at Uppsala University Hospital.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent surgery for SI-NET between 2013 and 2023 at Uppsala University Hospital. Variables such as operative time, length of hospital stay, use of analgesia and radicality were compared between groups of patients operated on before and after 2019, when hand-port assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) for SI-NETs was introduced at our unit. Outcomes were further compared between open and hand-port assisted laparoscopic approaches. The primary outcome was the rate of radicality achieved for stage II-III patients. Secondary outcomes included operative time, the length of hospital stay and the use of epidural and patient-controlled analgesia.
resultsOf 97 patients, 58 (59.8%) underwent open surgery and 39 (40.2%) underwent hand-port assisted laparoscopic surgery. There was no significant difference in operative time (121 min [91.3-150.3] vs 108 min [83-141]), length of hospital stay, 6 days [4-7] vs 5 days [4-8]), and surgical radicality in patients with stage II-III, 85.2% vs 100%, (p = 0.079). 86.2% of patients with explorative laparotomy required epidural analgesia compared to only 23.1% with HALS (p < 0.001).
conclusionHand-port assisted laparoscopic surgery of SI-NETs is a feasible approach that preserves radical resection while enhancing postoperative recovery, with a lower requirement of epidural analgesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.