ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2025
Cognitive trajectories in older adults and associated mortality and predictors.
Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differences across males and females in cognitive aging and mortality risk: a trajectory-based approach.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Article
- Functional decline in the final years of life: A multicohort study.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- Development and validation of MethylCog, a blood DNA methylation proxy for cognition.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Prediction model for postoperative delirium risk in elderly hypertensive patients: machine learning-based development and validation.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- ADL and Cognitive Function in Chinese Elderly: Mediating Role of Social Participation and Moderating Role of Intergenerational Support.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo test the hypotheses that declining cognitive aging trajectories would increase mortality risk and that predictors of mortality would differ between trajectory groups.
methodsThis is a sub-study of the ZARADEMP project studying dementia and depression in older adults aged 55 years or more, conducted in Zaragoza, Spain, including 2403 cognitively healthy individuals who had completed at least three of the four waves in a 12-year follow-up. The three cognitive trajectories previously identified were based on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Mortality information obtained from the city's official population registry was registered up to 6 years after the end of the fourth wave of the study. Cox proportional hazard regression analyses for analyzing the risk of death were performed globally and for each cognitive trajectory.
resultsAt follow-up, 42.4% of the participants had died. Individuals in class 2-moderate-stable and in class 3-low-and-declining had a 24% and 96%, respectively, higher risk of mortality than those in class 1-high-to-moderate. Those younger and women showed significant lower risks of death in all the classes. Being single, with diabetes, dependency in basic Activities of Daily Living, ex-drinkers, smokers, and ex-smokers increased the risk in class 2. Hypertension showed a higher risk of death in the high-to-moderate group. In the low-and-declining trajectory, anxiety nearly tripled the risk of death.
conclusionTrajectories with cognitive decline are associated with higher mortality, with the risk of death showing a gradient. Predictors of mortality differ by cognitive trajectory; the differences being observed even among the cognitively healthier groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.