ReviewJournal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection2025
Inadequacies in uveitis: misnomers, incongruencies, persistence of obsolete terminologies & inappropriate guidelines, treatment inadequacies, and misinterpretations.
Review in Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From white dot syndromes to primary inflammatory choriocapillaropathies (PICCPs): updating and expanding the spectrum through multimodal imaging.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2026Review
- Inadequacies in Uveitis: About the Whimsical Terminology of Bacillary Layer Detachment.Journal of current ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInadequacies in medicine are manifold including inadequate influence of opinion leaders and consensus groups on terminology, diagnostic criteria and treatment guidelines, obsolete classifications and terms as well as misinterpretations of disease mechanisms. This is no different for uveitis and possibly even more pronounced as these are rare entities. PURPOSE: To underline inadequacies in uveitis including inadequate diagnostic criteria and treatment guidelines, misnomers, obsolescence of terminology, misinterpretation of disease processes and inadequate or underuse of investigative modalities in uveitis. This is a first report to be followed by others.
methodsA critical retrospective literature review of selected inadequacies in uveitis practice.
resultsWe investigate the mechanism of abuse of power of opinion leaders through the historical events such as the delay in acceptance of antiviral treatment for zoster ophthalmicus, report inadequacies and misnomers resulting from opinion articles or opinion surveys, inadequate treatment guidelines such as for Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease (VKH) , delays in adopting appropriate classifications, inappropriate pathophysiological interpretations such as for multiple evanescent white dot syndromes (MEWDS), reluctance to implement ICGA use, a crucial biomarker for choroiditis, among others.
conclusionInadequacies in uveitis are not so rare and often result from inadequate influence of opinion leaders oe groups. Some are harmless although annoying, such as misnomers, while others can be harmful such as inadequate treatment guidelines.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.