ArticleMicromachines2025
Design and Fabrication of a Piezoelectric Bimorph Microphone with High Reliability and Dynamic Range Based on Al
Article in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Simulation and Analysis of a Silicon Membrane-Supported Beam-Island Diaphragm for Graphene Piezoresistive MEMS Microphones in High-SPL Acoustic Sensing.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Design and Implementation of Miniaturized Low-Frequency Flexibility-Enhanced Rotating Cantilever Beam Piezoelectric MEMS Microphone.Micromachines · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the development of technology, MEMS microphones, which are small-sized and highly uniform, have been applied extensively. To improve their reliability in extreme environment and overcome the constraints of traditional microphones, this article presents a piezoelectric bimorph MEMS microphone using Al0.8Sc0.2N. In the article, the high robustness of piezoelectric microphones and the reasons for choosing Al0.8Sc0.2N as piezoelectric materials are described. The sensitivity of an Al0.8Sc0.2N-based piezoelectric bimorph compared with the traditional structure are revealed through FEA. Subsequently, a lumped element microphone model is constructed and all noise sources are evaluated comprehensively. The difference in output noise caused by different structures is calculated. The designed piezoelectric microphone, which comprises eight triangular cantilever beams, was fabricated on a chip with an area of 900 μm × 900 μm. The sensitivity of the designed microphone achieves 1.68 mV/Pa, with a noise floor of -110 dBA and SNR of 54.5 dB. The acoustic overload point of the microphone stands at 147 dB SPL, and following the impact test, the survival rate was 100%. Compared to traditional MEMS microphones, the microphone achieves a dynamic range of 107.5 dB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.