Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40047710›Full record

ReviewMicromachines2025

Redesigning FDM Platforms for Bio-Printing Applications.

Burak Turker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Burak TurkerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Ahmet Necdet Sezer Campus, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyonkarahisar 03200, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) is a prominent additive manufacturing technique known for its ability to provide cost-effective and fast printing solutions. FDM enables the production of computer-aided 3D designs as solid objects at macro scales with high-precision alignment while sacrificing excellent surface smoothness compared to other 3D printing techniques such as SLA (Stereolithography) and SLS (Selective Laser Sintering). Electro-Spinning (ES) is another technique for producing soft-structured nonwoven micro-scale materials, such as nanofibers. However, compared to the FDM technique, it has limited accuracy and sensitivity regarding high-precision alignment. The need for high-precision alignment of micro-scaled soft structures during the printing process raises the question of whether FDM and ES techniques can be combined. Today, the printing technique with such capability is called Melt Electro Writing (MEW), and in practice, it refers to the basic working principle on which bio-printers are based. This paper aims to examine how these two techniques can be combined affordably. Comparatively, it presents output production processes, design components, parameters, and materials used in output production. It discusses the limitations and advantages of such a hybrid platform, specifically from the perspective of engineering design and its biomedical applications.

Indexed as

3D printersadditive manufacturingbiomedical applicationsbio-printingdesignelectrospinningfused deposition modelingmelt electrowritingmodification

Identifiers

PMID40047710
PMCPMC11857145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.