ArticleMicromachines2025
pH Measurements Using Leaky Waveguides with Synthetic Hydrogel Films.
Article in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Leaky waveguides (LWs) are low-refractive-index films deposited on glass substrates. In these, light can travel in the film while leaking out at the film-substrate interface. The angle at which light can travel in the film is dependent on its refractive index and thickness, which can change with pH when the film is made of pH-responsive materials. Herein, we report an LW comprising a waveguide film made of a synthetic hydrogel containing the monomers acrylamide and N-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]methacrylamide (DMA) and a bisacrylamide crosslinker for pH measurements between 4 and 8. The response of the LW pH sensor was reversible and the response times were 0.90 ± 0.14 and 2.38 ± 0.22 min when pH was changed from low to high and high to low, respectively. The reported LW pH sensor was largely insensitive to typical concentrations of common interferents, including sodium chloride, urea, aluminum sulfate, calcium chloride, and humic acid. Compared to a glass pH electrode, the measurement range is smaller but is close to the range required for monitoring the pH of drinking water. The pH resolution of the hydrogel sensor was ~0.004, compared to ~0.01 for the glass electrode.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.