ReviewMicromachines2025
Design and Fabrication of Microelectrodes for Dielectrophoresis and Electroosmosis in Microsystems for Bio-Applications.
Review in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electrokinetic Microfluidics at the Convergence Frontier: From Charge-Driven Transport to Intelligent Chemical Systems.Micromachines · 2025Review
- Electroosmotic flow of Jeffrey ternary hybrid nanofluids in converging-diverging ciliary microvessels.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A Review on AC-Dielectrophoresis of Nanoparticles.Micromachines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microfluidic technology has emerged as a multidisciplinary field, integrating fluid dynamics, electronics, materials science, etc., enabling precise manipulation of small volumes of fluids and particles for various bio-applications. Among the forms of energy integrated into microfluidic systems, electric fields are particularly advantageous for achieving precise control at the microscale. This review focuses on the design and fabrication of microelectrodes that drive electrokinetic phenomena, dielectrophoresis (DEP) and electroosmotic flow (EOF), key techniques for particle and fluid manipulation in microfluidic devices. DEP relies on non-uniform electric fields to manipulate particles based on their dielectric properties, while EOF utilizes uniform electric fields to generate consistent fluid flow across microchannels. Advances in microelectrode fabrication, including photolithography, soft lithography, and emerging non-cleanroom techniques, are discussed. Additionally, the review explores innovative approaches such as rapid prototyping, contactless electrodes, and three-dimensional structures, along with material considerations like conductive polymers and carbon composites. The review discusses the role of microelectrodes in enhancing device functionality, scalability, and reliability. The paper also identifies challenges, including the need for improved fabrication reproducibility and multifunctional integration. Finally, potential future research directions are proposed to further optimize DEP- and EOF-based microsystems for advanced biomedical and diagnostic applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.