Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40047623›Full record

ReviewMicromachines2025

Magnetic Polymeric Conduits in Biomedical Applications.

Sayan Ganguly, Shlomo Margel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Magnetic Ionogel and Its Applications.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sayan GangulyDepartment of Chemistry, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.
Shlomo MargelDepartment of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan Institute for Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials (BINA), Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 5290002, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-6524-8179

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic polymeric conduits are developing as revolutionary materials in regenerative medicine, providing exceptional benefits in directing tissue healing, improving targeted medication administration, and facilitating remote control via external magnetic fields. The present article offers a thorough examination of current progress in the design, construction, and functionalization of these hybrid systems. The integration of magnetic nanoparticles into polymeric matrices confers distinctive features, including regulated alignment, improved cellular motility, and targeted medicinal delivery, while preserving structural integrity. Moreover, the incorporation of multifunctional attributes, such as electrical conductivity for cerebral stimulation and optical characteristics for real-time imaging, expands their range of applications. Essential studies indicate that the dimensions, morphology, surface chemistry, and composition of magnetic nanoparticles significantly affect their biocompatibility, degrading characteristics, and overall efficacy. Notwithstanding considerable advancements, issues concerning long-term biocompatibility, biodegradability, and scalability persist, in addition to the must for uniform regulatory frameworks to facilitate clinical translation. Progress in additive manufacturing and nanotechnology is overcoming these obstacles, facilitating the creation of dynamic and adaptive conduit structures designed for particular biomedical requirements. Magnetic polymeric conduits, by integrating usefulness and safety, are set to transform regenerative therapies, presenting a new avenue for customized medicine and advanced healthcare solutions.

Indexed as

magnetic nanoparticlesmagnetic polymeric conduitsmultifunctional biomaterialsregenerative medicinetissue repair

Identifiers

PMID40047623
PMCPMC11857720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.